Skip to main content

European cohesion 

European cohesion - News 2023

Promoting European cohesion at the local level: The Emperor Maximilian Prize Application is calling Young Europeans


The Emperor Maximilian Prize celebrates outstanding achievements from all sectors in the field of European cohesion. This year’s edition focuses on youth, beacon projects that inspire young people to shape their own future. Candidates for the 2023 edition are invited to submit their application by 20 April.

The Emperor Maximilian Prize is open to citizens from the 27 member countries of the EU and/or the 46 member countries of the Council of Europe. Their initiatives should contribute to strengthening European cohesion and implement local best practices that are transferable to other communities. Candidates are invited to submit their project by 20 April 2023 on the online platform.

The jury is composed of representatives from five institutions, among which the Council of European Municipalities and Regions (CEMR). Fabrizio Rossi, the Secretary General of the Council of European Municipalities and Regions commented: “We are honoured to have been a part of this event since 1999 as it is both a celebration and a reinforcement of endeavours towards a deeper European integration”.

During the month of May, the jury will convene to assess the submitted projects and initiatives, on the basis of various criteria, including sustainability, creativity and visibility.

The winning project will receive the Emperor Maximilian Prize during a prestigious ceremony taking place in the city of Innsbruck in November. Winners will be awarded a cash prize worth €10,000 as a financial contribution to their exceptional initiative, a certificate, and a medallion of Emperor Maximilian I from 1509.
For more information on eligibility and selection criteria, consult the official “Guide for Applicants”.

About the Prize

The Emperor Maximilian Prize is a biannual European award. It was created in 1997 by the City of Innsbruck and the Region of the Tyrol in honour of the long-time mayor of Innsbruck, Alois Lugger. The prize aims to reward regional and local initiatives that embody the European unification process as outstanding examples of solidarity and sustainable efforts.

In 2021, the “#EuropagegenCovid19 / #EUmythbusters” project, which fought against disinformation about Covid with humorous and educational online content, was awarded for its contribution to European integration.

The 2023 edition’s expert jury will consist of representatives from the City of Innsbruck, the Region of the Tyrol, the University of Innsbruck, the European Committee of the Regions, the Congress of Local and Regional Authorities, the Assembly of European Regions, and the Council of European Municipalities and Regions.

Contact info

+43 512 5360 2357
kaisermaximilianpreis@innsbruck.gv.at

Cohesion Alliance

Cohesion Alliance - News 2023

Only a strong Cohesion Policy can ensure a united and fairer future to the EU


​The new #CohesionAlliance gets into gear to shape the future of the main investment policy of the EU.

The key challenges and future objectives of Cohesion Policy were the main focus of the high-level event organised by the #CohesionAlliance on 16 March. The EU-wide coalition of 12,000 signatories advocating for a stronger Cohesion Policy launched two calls addressed to European local and regional authorities to collect their feedback on the future role and design of cohesion policy, and to showcase the unique role of this policy in supporting cities’ and regions’ development in every corner of Europe. 

The #CohesionAlliance is a joint movement of like-minded representatives cities and regions and their associations, and of social partners and civic society representatives that advocate cohesion as a fundamental value of the EU and plead for a strong Cohesion Policy beyond 2027. After the successful campaign to secure a central role for Cohesion Policy in the 2021-27 EU long-term budget – which brought together more than 12,000 signatories, 140 regions, 137 cities and counties, 50 associations of regional and local governments, many Members of the European Parliament and 35 EU sectoral associations – the #CohesionAlliance is now ready for a new challenge.

Today’s event kicks off the reflection process of the new Cohesion Alliance on the future of Cohesion Policy, which will bring together key stakeholders, regional and local representatives, EU and national institutions, in order to make the policy stronger, simpler, more effective and result-oriented now and in the future.

Vasco Alves Cordeiro, President of the European Committee of the Regions (CoR), stated: ” If we break Cohesion Policy, we may still have a European Union, but it will not move forward the same way. The objectives of Cohesion Policy are always territorial, economic and social cohesion, but the context has changed. When we talk about migration and integration of refugees, or about energy transition, just to name two challenges, it is always cohesion that is at stake. We need to adapt Cohesion Policy and update it, but it is very important to not become hostage of the discussion about money only. The question should always be what kind of solution we want to face the challenges in front of us. Cohesion Policy is the answer. I invite you all to join the Cohesion Alliance, because this is about what kind of Europe we want in the future .”

Younous Omarjee, Chair of the European Parliament’s Committee for regional development, said: ” Cohesion Policy is a cornerstone policy of the European Union, it brings Europe together. The new generation of funds is meant to help regions to achieve the green and digital transition, and to reduce development gaps in the EU. For the future, we want to strengthen this policy to face the major challenges: energy and industrial sovereignty, adaptation to climate change, demographic crisis .”

Elisa Ferreira, EU Commissioner for Cohesion and Reforms, addressed the #CohesionAlliance partners via a video message: ” We have now started the reflection on the future of Cohesion Policy and we are carrying out a deepened discussion on the achievements and the way forward. I count on the Cohesion Alliance to make a substantial contribution to this important discourse, as well as on activating the communities that they represent to speak up! We have to spread the word on the successes of the Policy, the empowerment that it brought to EU regions and municipalities and to the transformations possible thanks to Cohesion Policy investments. Let’s discuss what and how could be improved, as we are entering this new period 2021-2027, and looking beyond, so that the Policy remains the powerful pull holding Europe together and reminding us of a joint destiny! ” she said.

Emil Boc, Chair of the CoR’s Commission for Territorial Cohesion Policy and Budget ( COTER ) and Mayor of Cluj-Napoca (RO) said: ” With today’s meeting we have launched a reflection process of the Cohesion Alliance that will continue throughout the year and that will enable us to position the Alliance on the question of how Cohesion Policy should be shaped in the future. However, it is also crucial that this reflection process is as inclusive as possible and that all of those who are interested in a future with a strong and effective Cohesion Policy for all regions have a possibility to provide us with their input .”

Karl-Heinz Lambertz, President of the Association of European Border Regions ( AEBR ) and member of the Parliament of the German-speaking Community in Belgium, said: ” Cohesion Policy improves the development of all territories, including particularly those handicapped due to their location and other circumstances. It facilitates their cooperation adding an enormous value in terms of functionality. Without Cohesion and cooperation, the disadvantages of these territories would only grow and consolidate .”

Adrián Ariel Zittelli Ferrari, Conference of Peripheral Maritime Regions ( CPMR) political representative, Director-General for European Union Affairs for the Region of Murcia, said: ” Many of Europe’s current and upcoming challenges are linked to territorial circumstances on the ground, and vary from region to region. Cohesion policy should offer opportunities and support to all citizens regardless of their location, and help them fully participate in European development and the single market. Therefore, Cohesion Policy should be maintained as the main investment policy for all regions in the EU . “

The European Committee of the Regions has started its political debate on the matter and appointed President Cordeiro and the Chair of the COTER Commission Boc as co-rapporteurs of an opinion on the future of cohesion policy after 2027.


More info:

The #CohesionAlliance launched two calls for contribution targeting local and regional authorities in Europe:

  • a broad consultation to receive feedback on the future role and design of cohesion policy. Respondents can access the consultation and send their contribution here.
  • a call for Cohesion Local Stories to showcasing how cohesion policy has a unique role to support cities’ and regions’ development. Respondents can send their contributions via this link. The stories will be then used for the campaign and published on the Cohesion Alliance’s website.


If you want to stay up to date with all the activities of the #CohesionAlliance and the latest development on cohesion policy, you can sign up to receive the new #CohesionAlliance newsletter here.

Contact:

CohesionAlliance@cor.europa.eu

Safeguarding local investments 

Investing in Europe - News

Why EU economic governance reform must protect municipalities’ ability to invest 


The Council of European Municipalities and Regions (CEMR) has warned that the upcoming reform of the EU’s economic governance framework, including the Stability and Growth Pact (SGP), could risk undermining the investment capacity of municipalities and regions across Europe. 

Local and regional governments are responsible for almost half of all public investments in the EU. These investments are essential to deliver on European priorities such as the green transition, digitalisation, and resilient infrastructure. However, the proposed introduction of net expenditure ceilings risks unintentionally penalising local governments, who generally borrow only for long-term investments in capital assets. 

Reform and its implications 

The European Commission has announced plans to simplify the SGP by replacing certain rules, including the medium-term objective (MTO), with a new system of net expenditure ceilings. While CEMR welcomes the move away from the MTO, which had previously constrained local investment through deficit limits and reduced transfers from central governments, it raises serious concerns about the impact of the new ceilings. 

Applying net expenditure limits to municipalities would create three major risks

  • Higher administrative burdens arise because local governments do not use the net expenditure concept in their accounting. 
  • Political mismatches, since local electoral cycles rarely align with national fiscal programming. 
  • Cuts in public investment, as postponing infrastructure projects, are often the only quick adjustment available under tight expenditure ceilings. 

This is even though local government debt levels are prudent in every EU Member State, and are already strictly monitored under national rules. 

The solution: exclude local expenditure 

CEMR is therefore calling for the exclusion of local government expenditure from the definition of net expenditure ceilings in the reformed SGP. Much like cyclical unemployment spending is excluded, removing local investment from these calculations would ensure municipalities can continue to provide essential services, maintain infrastructure, and invest in the future without being penalised by centralised fiscal targets. 

At a time when Europe urgently needs stronger local action to address climate, digital, and social challenges, weakening municipalities’ ability to invest would be counterproductive. Protecting local public investment within the EU’s economic governance reform is not just about budgets, it is about safeguarding Europe’s capacity to deliver on its ambitions. 

Read the position paper here 

For more information, contact: 

Cohesion policy funds 2021-2027

European Town - News

Cities and municipalities in the driving seat for EU Cohesion Policy funds?


What is the common feature between the trolleybuses in Otsravian metropolitan area (Czech Republic), the local food businesses in Ljubljana Urban Region (Slovenia) and the traditional dance festival in Saint-Gervais-d’Auvergne (France)? They all benefited from the European Cohesion Policy through integrated territorial investments (ITI) or community-led-local development (CLLD).
 
Behind the term “EU Cohesion Policy” we can find a variety of programmes and fundings such as the European Regional Development Fund (ERDF), the European Social Fund (ESF) or the European Agricultural Fund for Rural Development (EAFRD) although the latter is now directly attached to the Common Agricultural Policy.
 
In practice, these funds reach thousands of towns, cities and regions, as well as other beneficiaries through the intermediation of “Managing Authorities” which can be national Ministries or Regions. But there are two lesser-known dimensions of these funds which are directly  implemented on the ground: the so-called ‘ITI’ and ‘CLLD’
 
ITI and CLLD
 
Integrated Territorial Investments (ITI) and Community Led Local Development (CLLD) are the main mechanisms used to implement European Cohesion Policy funding in an integrated and place-based manner. Using these tools to implement Cohesion Policy funds is a guarantee that local governments and local stakeholders will be closely associated in the design, implementation and monitoring of the EU funds they receive.
 
They can allow the use of different funds in an integrated way. For instance, a rural municipality interested in a social inclusion project could combine ESF and EAFRD in a single, comprehensive project.
 
On paper ITI and CLLD are great tools for local and regional governments… But how do they translate in practice?
 
In 2015, we delved into the analysis of the use of the ITI  in different Member States. A few years later, with the start of the new programming period 2021-2027, we reiterated the experiment to understand how these tools were used in practice in the previous period and what the lessons learned and changes in their implementations. Click here to read the full study.
 
To do so, CEMR reached out to some of its member associations to gather feedback on the implementation and planning of ITI and CLLD tools from the perspective of cities and municipalities.
 
Highly appreciated tools, but some difficulties in implementation remain
 
Overall, the many feedbacks we received were quite positive. ITI and CLLD are considered great instruments thanks to their adaptability to local needs and specificities. They empower local authorities, and by doing so help raise their capacities in managing EU funds. But they also strengthen multi-level dialogue between the local authorities and the Managing authorities (either the Ministry or the Region). Hence reinforcing the trust between the different governance levels.
 
All is not yet rosy either: some challenges remain for fully tapping into the potential of these tools such as the administrative burden still inherent to Cohesion policy funds in general. In CEMR’s new analysis, we also identified some recommendations to improve the uptake of ITI and CLLD in the current and future programming period.

Read the study here

For more information, contact:

Local Finances

Local Finance - News 2023

How to unleash local public investments for the green transition


As the EU struggles to find ways to pay for industry transition towards a carbon-free economy, the finances of local governments play an often-neglected role in delivering the needed investments, argues a report by the Council of European Municipalities and Regions (CEMR).

The report retraces the development of local finances over the past decade and how they can influence the ability of municipalities to finance the green transition.

For example, the report found that countries with a more decentralised structure further decentralised their public finances in the past decade, while those with more centralised public spending became even more centralised.

“Federal countries, for example, Germany, went towards more decentralisation,” CEMR’s Vincent Furlan told EURACTIV.

According to the report, this polarisation is relevant because countries with decentralised public finances tend to invest more in the green transition.

“More centralised countries have lost some margin of manoeuvre in terms of investments as a part of their total expenditure,” Furlan said. However, he stressed that this was not necessarily a causal relation between the two as the lower investment appetite of countries with more centralised public finances may be caused by other factors.

Unrelated to centralisation, Furlan stressed that “local and regional governments have a significant weight in investment expenditure”.

“Local and regional governments invest in areas determinant for the green transition.”

For example, local transport infrastructure or waste management facilities are often governed locally and can have a significant environmental impact.

However, municipalities and regions are often constrained in their ability to invest in the green transition as fiscal rules, and the lack of access to financial markets can make it hard for regional governments to undertake the necessary investments.

The issue that too-strict fiscal rules can affect investments has long been a topic of debate at the EU level. However, this debate usually focused on national rather than regional or local, finances. Then, in November this year, the European Commission announced its intention to reform the national fiscal rules and allow member states to invest more in the green transition.

Yet, the local level is often forgotten in these discussions. In a position paper, CEMR argued that the EU’s current fiscal rules constrain local finances since local government debt is included in the calculation of total national debt.

“More flexibility should be granted for local and regional governments, particularly when investing for long-term and sustainable development,” the paper reads.

However, excluding local debt from the national debt calculations could incentivise governments to reallocate their expenditure and their debts to local governments, which might give local governments more leeway to invest, but which also might undermine the effectiveness of the fiscal rules.

Another obstacle to the green investments of local and regional governments is the lack of access to financial markets. In contrast to national governments, local and regional administration cannot count on the same investor appetite for their debt issue and have more difficulty accessing funding.

And as their debt is usually considered riskier, they will also have to pay higher interest rates.

But better access to financial tools might expand the options for local governments to fund themselves. “Because local governments can make a large contribution to the green transition, granting them more access to financial instruments would be beneficial,” Furlan argued.

This article was first published on EURACTIV‘s website.

Bringing Europe closer to its citizens 

EU Cohesion Policy - News

How ITI and CLLD strengthen local democracy, multi-level governance, and place-based development in EU cohesion policy 


The European Union’s Cohesion Policy is one of its most important instruments for promoting economic, social, and territorial cohesion across its member states. With nearly €392 billion allocated for 2021–2027, it tackles inequalities between regions while supporting a greener, more competitive, and more inclusive Europe. Central to this effort are Integrated Territorial Investments (ITI) and Community-Led Local Development (CLLD), two tools designed to put territorial needs and local actors at the heart of EU funding. 

Why integrated tools matter 

The foundations for a place-based approach were laid in the 2009 Barca Report, which argued that EU policy should focus on unlocking the potential of specific territories while addressing persistent exclusion. ITI and CLLD, introduced in 2014, operationalise this vision by giving local and regional governments a stronger role in programming, governance, and project implementation. 

These tools provide flexibility, enable cooperation across levels of government, and ensure that EU funds target the real needs of communities. For municipalities, regions, and their associations, they are among the most valued features of cohesion policy. 

ITI: Integrating strategies across territories 

ITI allows funding from several EU programmes to be combined in support of integrated strategies. It has been especially used for urban development, where at least 8% of ERDF funding is earmarked for sustainable urban projects. While designed to cover any functional area, urban, rural, or mixed, ITI is most common in metropolitan settings, where challenges like mobility, housing, and regeneration demand integrated solutions. 

CLLD: Communities leading the way 

CLLD builds on the LEADER approach to rural development, empowering local action groups of citizens, NGOs, and businesses to design and implement strategies. While most common in rural areas, it has the potential to strengthen participation and ownership in cities, too. CLLD fosters trust, encourages bottom-up innovation, and helps address the needs of vulnerable groups such as youth, migrants, or elderly people. 

What worked well 

CEMR’s analysis highlights several clear benefits: 

  • Flexibility and relevance – ITI and CLLD adapt EU funding to local needs. 
  • Capacity-building – local authorities gain expertise in managing EU programmes. 
  • Stronger governance – fostering trust and cooperation between local, regional, and national levels. 
  • Visibility of EU action – projects close to citizens showcase the value of EU funds. 
  • Community cohesion – encouraging cooperation among local actors and building metropolitan or regional identity. 

Persistent challenges 

Despite their value, integrated tools face obstacles: 

  • Administrative burden remains high, with complex procedures and slow fund absorption. 
  • Limited flexibility – strategies must still align with national operational programmes, sometimes restricting genuine local priorities. 
  • Time pressures – integrated projects require trust and participation, often at odds with the EU’s strict N+3 spending rule. 
  • Uneven use of PO5 (“Europe closer to citizens”) – some member states underfund this priority despite its direct link to ITI and CLLD. 
  • Urban uptake of CLLD – adapting the rural-focused model to cities remains difficult. 

CEMR recommendations 

Looking ahead, municipalities and regions urge the EU to: 

  • Maintain and strengthen integrated tools in cohesion policy. 
  • Simplify procedures at both EU and national levels, avoiding “gold-plating.” 
  • Clarify guidance on multi-funding, project selection, and the use of PO5. 
  • Exempt ITI/CLLD projects from the N+3 rule to allow more time for participatory approaches. 
  • Reintegrate the EAFRD into the Common Provision Regulation to ease multi-fund projects. 
  • Ensure meaningful local involvement in programming, implementation, and evaluation. 

Conclusion 

ITI and CLLD have proven their worth as vehicles for place-based development, democratic participation, and closer cooperation between Europe and its citizens. While challenges remain, strengthening these tools is essential for making the EU’s cohesion policy more visible, more inclusive, and more responsive to local realities. 

Read the study here 

For more information, contact: 

Sustainable local finances in Europe

Sustainable local finances - News 2022

CEMR releases landmark study on local finances in European countries


People depend on quality local public services and infrastructure every day. Reliable buses, insulated public housing, good schools or clean energy: all of these and more depend on healthy and sustainable local public finances to be developed and maintained.

That’s why the Council of European Municipalities and Regions (CEMR) is releasing a fully-fledged online report and tool entitled Local Finances and the Green Transition in Europe. This one-of-a-kind study provides data and analysis on the trends in local and regional finances in 40 European countries over the past 10 years. The study offers a bird’s eye view of both changes in subnational finances and the remarkable diversity of national situations.

This report is essential reading for policymakers, politicians and academics. Only by understanding local public finances and unlocking futher investments can we achieve the sustainable and resilient societies our people and planet need”, said CEMR Secretary General, Fabrizio Rossi, who added: “If this report shows one thing, it is that well-funded municipalities, counties and regions are essential to taking care of our people and realising the environmental transition“. 

Revealing figures and trends as observed over the last decade

The study reveals for instance that despite making up 25% of all public spending, local and regional governments finance 54% of all public investment. This reflects the leading role of municipalities and regions in investing in areas such as energy efficient housing, smarter public transport and local environmental protection. The climate and energy transition will only happen by working with local and regional governments.

Also noteworthy is that subnational government debt is at a manageable level in the 36 countries where comparative data was available. In fact, local debt is low and stable, a mere 4.8% of GDP on average. By way of comparison, general government debt increased by the middle of the decade to 67% of GDP (and to 81% in 2020).

While browsing through the online study, you will also come across a special section on the impact of the EU’s €720-billion post-COVID recovery plan on local and regional governments. This chapter looks in particular at the implications for the green transition and territorial cohesion.

The data shows clearly that the share of green transition among the main RRF spending areas is higher in the decentralised countries. Stronger local and regional governments can support more recovery and resilience programmes and actions.

A dynamic and interactive online tool

“Local Finances and the Green Transition in Europe” is available as an interactive online tool  as well as in PDF  format. The online tool contains:

The study is currently only available in English. The French version is under development.

The study was launched on 10 November 2022 at the occasion of a seminar bringing together representatives of many of CEMR’s member associations, the OECD, KDZ and the study’s co-author Gábor Péteri.

For more information:

Next Generation EU

Cohesion Policy - News

State of Play – Recovery and Resilience Facility


In 2020, faced with the unprecedented Covid-19 pandemic, European Union (EU) leaders and the European Commission put in place an equally unprecedented response package: Next Generation EU. It allows the EU to borrow large amounts of funding from the financial markets and to allocate these to Member States. The Next Generation EU’s centrepiece, the Recovery and Resilience Facility (RRF), provides grants and loans over a period of 5 years, amounting to €724 billion (in current prices) in total, to support the rebound of EU economies following the pandemic.

EU Member States have been required to submit national Recovery and Resilience Plans (RRPs), which outline their respective investment and reform strategies for using the RRF financing. The RRPs should outline a 5-year reform and investment strategy and set the pace of transformation needed for robust and fair digital and sustainable transitions. Member States have recently been given the opportunity to adapt their national plans to consider the new challenges thrown up by the war in Ukraine and its impact on the cost of energy supplies.

Local and Regional Governments involvement

Since early on in the process, CEMR and the European Committee of the Regions (CoR) have worked together to push for the fullest and most meaningful involvement of local and regional governments (LRGs), both in the design and the implementation of the Recovery and Resilience. An initial study produced jointly by the CoR and CEMR and published in January 2021 highlighted the early efforts of LRGs to be involved in the preparation of the RRPs.

The results demonstrated the extensive problems experienced by LRGs, the lack of consultation on their national RRPs and even on the occasions where they were consulted, their contributions were often overlooked.

In May 2022 CEMR and CoR prepared a follow-up study, to explore the extent to which the situation had evolved positively and whether or not LRGs felt that their involvement in the implementation of the RRPs had improved. The results of this follow-up study were more mixed but the general feeling was that LGRs were concerned that the lack of partnership arrangements in delivering the RRPs was leading to less effective delivery of the RRPs on the ground.

Current developments

Member States are advancing with the implementation of their national recovery plans, setting out both new investments and reforms, and consequently a considerable amount of RRF funds have now been disbursed. It remains noticeable however, that a significant amount of the loans available remain unrequested by Member States. While there is potential for synergies between cohesion policy and the RRF, there is also the potential for overlap and a competition for funding due to insufficient coherence between the different instruments. Concerns are growing that prioritising the RFF could lead to a reduction of cohesion resources after 2027. There are growing calls for the opening of a serious debate on how to ensure coherence among different EU cohesion instruments, as well as which approach can deliver on EU objectives in a world where shocks have unfortunately become not only more frequent, but also more varied in nature.

At the start of summer 2022, the European Commission published its Review report on the implementation of the Recovery and Resilience Facility, setting out the Commission’s views on the performance of the RRF to date. This has since been followed by the first in a series of audits on the Recovery and Resilience Facility.

Based on a selected sample of six member States (France, Germany, Croatia, Greece, Spain and Italy), the European Court of Auditors (ECA) assessed the suitability of the RRFs for each of these countries, the guidance provided to each Member State and compliance with the RRF regulation. Overall the ECA’s felt that the Commission’s assessment was generally appropriate, given the complexity of the process and the time constraints. However, the ECA highlighted a number of weaknesses in the process and that risks to the implementation of the RRF remain.

The CoR too is preparing an opinion on the implementation of RRF following its earlier work and the publication of the European Commission’s Review report. We wait to see whether or not, a year on from its last opinion, the CoR now believes that the implementation of the RRF will enable important public funds to properly reach the needs of our communities, municipalities and regions. The CoR will adopt its opinion during the plenary session in February 2023.

How to unlock EU funds

EU financing opportunities - News

A guide to help local and regional governments navigate 2021–2027 funding opportunities and prepare successful proposals 


Accessing European Union funding can be complex, especially for municipalities and regions unfamiliar with project management procedures. To address this challenge, the Council of European Municipalities and Regions (CEMR) has developed a guide within its new External Funded Activities (EFA) Platform. The guide provides practical support for members, including information on funding opportunities, thematic priorities, and tips for writing strong proposals. 

The current Multiannual Financial Framework (MFF) 2021–2027, boosted by Next Generation EU, represents the EU’s largest-ever budget, totalling €2 trillion. More than half is dedicated to research, innovation, digitalisation, and climate action, while one-third supports cohesion policy. For local and regional governments (LRGs), this translates into significant opportunities to finance projects across diverse fields. 

The guide outlines how to navigate the Funding and Tenders Portal, the central entry point for EU calls. It explains how applicants can: 

  • Search funding opportunities and partners; 
  • Check eligibility; 
  • Submit proposals online; 
  • Manage reporting and compliance requirements. 

It also provides advice on preparing successful project proposals. Key recommendations include aligning projects with EU policy goals, ensuring sustainability and impact, and selecting experienced, committed partners. Strong project teams, clear narratives, and realistic budgets are critical for success. 

Finally, the guide emphasises capacity-building. CEMR encourages municipalities to build internal expertise, engage with partners early, and take advantage of available training and support services. 

By simplifying complex procedures, the CEMR guide aims to empower local and regional authorities to fully tap into EU funds and deliver projects that advance Europe’s priorities, from green transition to digital innovation. 

Read the study here 

For more information, contact: 

OECD Conference

Promoting the Global Goals - News 2023

Conference to launch the new SNG-WOFI


The OECD and United Cities and Local Governments (UCLG) are organising an in-person conference to launch the third edition of their World Observatory on Subnational Government Finance and Investment (SNG-WOFI).

The goal of the Observatory is to increase knowledge, promote dialogue on multi-level governance and subnational finance around the world as well as to monitor the implementation of the Sustainable Development Goals.

This 2022 edition includes data from 135 countries, covering almost 90% of the world surface area, 93% of the world population and 94% of global GDP.

The conference will bring together national and subnational governments, international organisations and stakeholders from around the world involved in this wide-ranging project, to present the key findings of the new edition and to discuss current challenges related to subnational finance and multi-level governance, in light of new data and analysis.

CEMR’s Finance Spokesperson, Flo Clucas, will take part in the Session 3 on : How can subnational government access to external resources be improved to finance infrastructure investment?

For more information and to register, please fill in this online form. If you have any questions, please contact Leslie Greenhow