Skip to main content

EU Climate Resilience Framework

Letter on Climate resilience

Climate-resilient Europe starts with resilient cities and regions

1,065 words
5–7 minutes

On 27 October 2026, the European Commission published its EU Framework for Climate Resilience, including a first European Climate Resilience Law and a Communication, the latter setting out accompanying support measures and policy initiatives. The package aims to move Europe from reacting to climate disasters towards anticipating and managing their risks.

The Council of European Municipalities and Regions (CEMR) welcomes the Framework, including the common scientific warming trajectory reference, provisions for participation of local and regional governments in national plans and tools to raise awareness on climate risks. But to turn this ambition into action, towns, cities and regions need a sustained role in decision-making, stronger capacity and predictable funding.

EU Climate Resilience Framework thumbnail (play)

A common reference global warming trajectory

The proposed Climate Resilience Law establishes a reference global warming trajectory of 1.5°C by 2030, 2°C by 2050 and 3°C by the end of the century, relative to pre-industrial levels. This provides a shared basis for climate risk assessments and strategic planning.

It aligns with CEMR’s policy paper ‘Adaptation together‘, calling for a common reference scenario to help governments make coherent decisions about infrastructure, spatial planning and investment. A shared understanding of future conditions can strengthen cooperation across administrative boundaries and help avoid investments that leave communities exposed to climate risks and disasters.

Yet a common reference must be translated into accessible, territorially relevant intelligence. Climate risks differ considerably between and within countries. National assessments must draw on local and regional knowledge and provide information detailed enough to support decisions on the ground.

Local and regional authorities as strategic partners for planning, monitoring, but also for implementation

CEMR considers a positive step that under Article 7 of the proposed Law, Member States have to give subnational authorities early and effective opportunities to participate in preparing national strategic plans and take their feedback into account. Towns, cities and regions already develop adaptation plans and have practical knowledge of local vulnerabilities, infrastructure and community needs. Their experience, existing plans and reports should inform national priorities and investment decisions.

CEMR, together with other networks of cities and regions, considers that this is not enough and called in a recent joint letter to the Commission for permanent and structured cooperation covering planning, implementation, monitoring and review.

The Commission intends to present an Implementation Plan within six months after adoption of the Law identifying support for its effective application at territorial level. CEMR calls for the Plan to provide guidance on a structured multi-level governance mechanism to ensure meaningful involvement of local and regional governments in shaping and implementing adaptation and resilience policies.

The proposed law also requires Member States to identify the public authorities responsible for managing major climate risks. Clearer responsibilities can improve coordination, particularly when risks cross sectors and territories. But these responsibilities must reflect existing competences and be matched by adequate decision-making powers, staff and resources.

“As an elected representative from Shetland, I see how important it is for European action to reflect the different risks and needs of our territories. For example, where I come from, the coastline is experiencing some of the most severe effects of climate change and accelerated erosion and even more extreme weather conditions. These place-specific impacts underline the critical role of local and regional governments in translating EU and national adaptation policies into concrete measures tailed to communities.” Gary Robinson, CEMR Spokesperson for Environment and Councillor of Shetland Islands

Knowledge must be backed by capacity

The package introduces useful tools including a European Climate Viewer, a Navigator of Climate Resilience Tools and a Mission Solutions Explorer. It also builds on support through the EU Mission on Adaptation and National Adaptation Hubs. These initiatives can help authorities understand risks, learn from practical examples and identify suitable measures.

However, access to information does not replace implementation capacity. Local and regional governments also need training, technical assistance, support for project preparation and opportunities for peer learning. These services must reach authorities of all sizes, including smaller municipalities and rural areas with more limited administrative resources.

Nature-based solutions need long-term support

CEMR welcomes the proposed requirement for European and national strategic plans to promote nature-based solutions and ecosystem-based adaptation and is pleased to see that calls made through a joint letter have been acknowledged in the proposed approach. Restored wetlands and floodplains, healthy soils, urban trees and other blue-green infrastructure can address several risks simultaneously while supporting biodiversity and quality of life.

Their inclusion must now translate into practical delivery and adequate financial support. Local governments need support for the full lifecycle of these measures, from planning and land management to implementation and maintenance. The links with water resilience and national nature restoration plans should help deliver coherent measures at the appropriate territorial scale.

Closing the funding gap

The European Commission identifies that adaptation investment needs are around €70 billion annually. It points to EU funding programmes – 35% of the future EU budget should be spent on climate and environment, the future National and Regional Partnership Plans and EIB financing. However, references to these instruments do not guarantee that local adaptation priorities will receive direct funding. The to-be-published Implementation Plan needs to emphasise dedicated funding to local and regional authorities, but in its current format, legislation does not explicitly require Member States to provide local and regional governments with adequate financial and technical support.

Planning must also be aligned with funding decisions. The next EU financial programming period starts in 2028, while national strategic resilience plans would not be due until the end of 2030. Investment priorities could therefore be established before these plans are finalised. To bridge this gap, existing local, regional and national adaptation plans must inform the preparation of future funding programmes, particularly the National and Regional Partnership Plans.

The Framework also addresses the climate insurance protection gap, a recognised challenge for local and regional governments. The CEMR webinar addressing the very topic of “Costs of climate and natural disaster risks” highlighted that climate adaptation is becoming a public finance necessity, not only an environmental objective, with a need for support for local resilience investments before disasters occur. CEMR welcomes the proposed EU Climate Insurance Alliance and suggests putting local and regional governments at the centre of the forthcoming Alliance.

CEMR will work with its member associations and the European institutions to strengthen the proposal, focusing on meaningful multilevel partnership, responsibilities matched by resources, and accessible implementation support.

For more information, contact:

Position Paper: Industrial Accelerator Act

Industrial Accelerator Act 2026

CEMR calls for an Industrial Accelerator Act that supports growth, jobs and local prosperity

530 words
2–3 minutes

Europe’s industrial transformation will be delivered locally. Cities, towns and regions are investors, permitting authorities and public contractors, which also directly implement a significant share of European legislation and investment on the ground. 

In the policy paper “Localising EU Industrial Ambition”, the Council of European Municipalities and Regions (CEMR) sets out how the Industrial Accelerator Act (IAA), proposed by the European Commission in July 2026, can support growth, jobs and local prosperity. To succeed, the IAA must recognise local and regional governments not only as implementing authorities, but as strategic partners in shaping and delivering industrial development. 

Faster permitting, anchored in territorial realities 

CEMR supports streamlining permit-granting as it can help accelerate strategic industrial investments. Achieving this requires better coordination, built on existing governance systems, respecting the division of competences, and preserving legal certainty, environmental safeguards and public participation. Shorter procedural deadlines alone cannot resolve existing challenges such as fragmented procedures, limited administrative capacities or environmental constraints.  

Single access points can improve coordination if they build on existing systems and use interoperable digital tools. They must not transfer planning or permitting powers from local and regional governments without their agreement. Timelines should be proportionate and adaptable and should not come at the expense of environmental assessment and public participation. Early coordination between competent local and regional authorities and project applicants, alongside long-term planning for strategic industrial projects, is essential to identify bottlenecks and address them to avoid investment delays. 

Industrial acceleration areas: no designation without local involvement 

Local and regional governments are best placed to assess the opportunities and constraints of a given area. CEMR consider that they must be involved from the outset, with their agreement required where designation affects their territory and legal competences, such as spatial planning, land use or infrastructure. Enabling infrastructure and services must be backed with adequate financing, rather than shifted onto local and regional budgets. 

A targeted and proportionate “Made in Europe” approach 

CEMR recognises the strategic objective behind the “Made in Europe” provisions. However, mandatory origin requirements in public procurement could significantly increase costs for authorities and, ultimately, for citizens if applied broadly. 

CEMR supports a targeted application in genuinely strategic sectors, based on transparent criteria, regular review and practical exemptions to safeguard affordability and public services continuity. Contracting authorities should not have to verify complex supply chains. Responsibility for demonstrating compliance must stay with economic operators, supported by an EU-wide certification system. CEMR also proposes lowering the cost-difference threshold for considering European supply disproportionately expensive, from 25% to 10%, giving public contractors more flexibility to manage operational costs.

Coherence and resources for implementation 

The IAA’s procurement provisions should be explicitly aligned with the future Public Procurement Act, to avoid overlapping rules. New responsibilities must also come with the means to deliver them. The European Commission estimates the IAA could add up to €8.92 million in annual administrative costs EU-wide. 

CEMR therefore calls for an assessment of the combined impact of streamlining initiatives on local and regional authorities, and for adequate financial, technical and administrative support, with particular attention to small and medium-sized municipalities. 

For more information, contact:

Webinar: Costs of climate and natural disaster risks

Climate disasters - News 2026

CEMR hosts a discussion on the evolving insurance landscape and its implications for local public finances

673 words
3–4 minutes

As climate-related disasters become a structural part of our reality, their financial consequences are placing growing pressure on local and regional budgets. By bringing together voices from local governments in Europe and Canada, European institutions and the insurance sector, CEMR led a webinar on 6 October on the evolving insurance landscape and its implications for local public finances.  

The diversity of perspectives reflected the reality that climate risks do not respect administrative boundaries, and neither should the search for solutions. Opening the webinar, Federica Bordelot, CEMR Director for Policy, stressed that local and regional governments are facing rising insurance premiums, tighter coverage conditions and, in some cases, difficulties obtaining insurance for certain assets or activities. With climate insurance rapidly moving up the European policy agenda, Bordelot emphasised the importance of fully involving local and regional governments in the discussions. 

“Climate risks materialise locally, and public infrastructure is managed locally and resilience in the end is built locally. There cannot be one-size-fits-all” – Federica Bordelot 

CEMR webinar 2026
CEMR webinar 2026

Ronan Dantec, Senator for Loire-Atlantique, France, and CEMR Spokesperson on Climate, pointed out the importance of solidarity and risk-sharing in the face of growing climate risks. Dantec recalled that “insurance is fundamentally based on pooling risks” and called for financial resources to be mobilised upstream to support adaptation and more resilient territories. He also highlighted the need for long-term financing mechanisms for local and regional governments. 

“We are probably at a level of financial effort [on the scale of adaptation needs] that corresponds to [those] after World War II.” – Ronan Dantec 

Understanding the insurance protection gap 

Opening the panel discussion, Pantelis Marinakis from the European Environment Agency explained the growing climate insurance protection gap. Marinakis stressed that climate risks are systemic and can cascade through households, businesses, banks, insurers and public finances. He also presented insurance as part of a broader resilience approach and identified key priorities to close the protection gap, including increasing risk awareness and transparency, preserving affordable insurance, expanding risk-bearing capacity and strengthening public-private partnerships. 

“The most durable way to keep insurance available and affordable is to reduce future losses through adaptation measures.” – Pantelis Marinakis 

Marien Ferdinandusse from the Public Finance Division of the European Central Bank highlighted what a growing climate insurance protection gap means for public finances. When losses are uninsured, governments can ultimately become risk-bearers, while insurance helps households and businesses rebuild after extreme weather events. As climate risks increase, he underlined the need to move from a reactive to a more proactive approach through adaptation, fiscal preparedness, and measures to reduce the insurance protection gap. 

Local and insurance sector perspectives 

Louise Wallace-Richmond, Councillor in the City of Salmon Arm in British Columbia, Canada, brought an international perspective to the discussion. Drawing on her municipality’s experience, she highlighted the impacts of disasters on local infrastructure, budgets and communities. She put emphasis on clarifying responsibilities between levels of government, maintaining affordable insurance and protecting essential infrastructure. 

Sibylle Steimen from Allianz brought the insurance sector perspective, stressing the importance of maintaining the broadest possible insurance market. She underlined the need to better inform customers about their exposure to risks and identified prevention and adaptation as essential to keeping insurance available and affordable. Steimen also pointed out that local adaptation measures can have a positive effect on insurance premiums. 

As discussions turned to possible solutions to the climate insurance protection gap, participants exchanged on the role of adaptation, the impact of local measures on insurance premiums and the need for cooperation between public authorities and the insurance sector. 

The recording of the webinar is available here. CEMR will continue exchanging with its members, engaging with the European Commission and supporting knowledge-sharing on this topic, especially as the European Commission is about to release an integrated framework for European climate resilience and risk management: the ‘Climate Insurance Alliance’. This webinar feeds into the future work and positioning of CEMR on these important initiatives.  

For more information, contact:

Joint letter on Climate Resilience

Letter on Climate resilience

Joint letter to President von der Leyen on Climate Resilience

600 words
3–4 minutes

After a series of natural disasters this summer, CEMR joins 30+ organisations call on the front line of floods, droughts, wildfires, mate disasters.  

Two days ahead of the State of the European Union address, the Council of European Municipalities and Regions (CEMR) has joined more than 30 organisations representing local and regional governments, sustainable farmers, water providers, healthcare providers and financial service providers in an open letter to European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen. The letter urges her to make nature-based solutions the first line of defence against climate disasters, and to embed this ambition in the upcoming European Framework for Climate Resilience. 

A summer that exposed Europe’s vulnerability 

The letter follows a summer that broke heat records and once again exposed how unprepared Europe is for the climate it already faces. Western Europe recorded its hottest June–July period since records began, with severe wildfires sweeping across the continent. At least 35,000 excess deaths have been linked to this summer’s back-to-back heatwaves, a figure that does not even include August, meaning the true toll is likely higher still. 

For local and regional governments, who are on the front line of responding to floods, droughts, wildfires and heatwaves, these are not abstract statistics. They translate directly into strained emergency services, damaged infrastructure, and communities left exposed. 

Restoring nature to restore resilience 

The signatories point to a common root cause behind Europe’s intensifying climate risks: the degradation of landscapes, soils and water systems. Wetlands, floodplains, peatlands, healthy soils, coastal ecosystems and forests naturally store water, recharge aquifers, regulate temperatures and buffer extreme events. Yet, these systems have been steadily lost or degraded across the continent, leaving communities exposed to increasingly volatile cycles of flooding, drought and heat. 

The letter calls the Commission to: 

  • Make the systemic integration of nature-based solutions a key priority in the legislative part of the European Framework for Climate Resilience;  
  • Provide legal incentives and financing mechanisms so that Member States manage landscapes and water systems to prioritise resilience, including national targets for natural water retention delivered through locally driven approaches that reflect territorial needs and capacities. 

This last point matters greatly for CEMR’s members: it recognises that effective climate adaptation must be designed and delivered at the local and regional level, where the knowledge of territorial needs and the capacity to act actually sit. 

A moment for action 

“Europe’s recent summers have shown that climate resilience can no longer be treated as a problem for the future. The Commission has acknowledged the vital role that nature-based solutions play in protecting communities and ecosystems from climate disasters. With the interservice consultation on the European Framework for Climate Resilience expected to begin before the end of September, now is the moment to ensure that this recognition is translated into the legislation itself,” said Claire Baffert, Senior EU Policy Officer, Water & Climate Change Adaptation at WWF EU, speaking on behalf of the 30+ signatories. 

President von der Leyen has herself acknowledged the stakes: in her State of the Union speech last year, she warned that climate change is making summers hotter, harsher and more dangerous, and that Europe must radically step up its efforts on resilience, adaptation and nature-based solutions. In July, she confirmed in writing to MEPs that nature-based solutions play an essential role in adapting to heatwaves, droughts, and floods. 

CEMR and its co-signatories are now calling on the Commission to turn that recognition into law and to give local and regional governments the tools, incentives and financing they need to lead the way. 

For more information, contact:

Our reaction to the Urban Wastewater Treatment directive 

Water management news 2026

CEMR warns EU Parliament’s move risks weakening the Polluter Pays Principle and undermining investments by local and regional governments and wastewater operators


Following today‘s European Parliament vote on a motion for resolution calling for a “stop the clock” on the implementation of the revised Urban Wastewater Treatment Directive (UWWTD), the Council of European Municipalities and Regions (CEMR) regrets the adoption of amendments calling on the European Commission to consider suspending the implementation of the Extended Producer Responsibility (EPR) and quaternary treatment obligations*. CEMR finds the resolution to be contradictory to all the efforts that are currently being undertaken by local and regional governments, and wastewater operators, which include optimising the machinery to meet the requirements of the revised Directive. 

According to Andrea Carli, CEMR spokesperson for the environment and Regional Councillor of Friuli Venezia Giulia “we are deeply concerned with the outcome of today’s plenary vote. We are standing with Europe’s local and regional governments and wastewater operators that have already been preparing the investments needed to implement the revised Urban Wastewater Treatment Directive.  What they need now is a clear commitment that the agreed implementation timeline will be respected.” 

The polluter pays principle, which states that those responsible for causing pollution should bear the costs of managing it and repairing the damage caused, is one of the cornerstones of EU environmental policy. Any suggestion that the implementation of EPR could be suspended risks undermining investor confidence. The revised Directive reached a carefully negotiated balance between protecting public health, safeguarding the environment, and ensuring that those responsible for pollution contribute to the costs of its removal. 

CEMR recognises the legitimate need to monitor the impact of the Directive on the availability of critical and generic medicines. However, it strongly believes these concerns should be addressed through the monitoring and flexibility mechanisms already provided for in the legislation.   

Therefore, CEMR calls the Commission to maintain the agreed implementation timeline and provide the legal certainty that local and regional governments, and wastewater operators need to invest in quaternary treatment. As Member States will likely start preparing next year their National and Regional Partnership Plans (NRPPs) under the next EU budget, delaying implementation could result in wastewater infrastructure investments being deprioritised or excluded from future funding plans.  

In a letter written last year to Commission President Ursula von der Leyen, CEMR and 11 other European organisations representing local and regional governments, public utilities, environmental NGOs, trade unions, and water professionals urged the Commission to firmly uphold the EPR scheme introduced by the revised UWWTD, which entered into force on 1 January 2025. 

*The quaternary treatment is the additional treatment step for removing micropollutants from urban wastewater, which is now an obligation introduced in the last revision of the UWWTD. EPR is the scheme that makes the contributor (pharmaceutical and cosmetic industry), cover at least 80% of the related treatment costs. 

Read more about CEMR‘s advocacy on the UWWTD implementation:  https://ccre-cemr.org/impact-community-climate/water/protecting-europes-water-future 

For more information, contact:

Climate Chance Summit 2026

Climate Chance Summit 2026

Cities and regions must lead Europe’s climate adaptation 


CEMR participated on 3 and 4 of June in the Climate Chance Europe Summit 2026 organised in Brussels by The Climate Chance association. The two-day event brought together local and regional leaders, European institutions, businesses, NGOs and civil society networks around a shared theme: climate adaptation as a lever for resilience and prosperity in Europe.  

The message shared by the Council of European Municipalities and Regions (CEMR) was that towns, cities and regions must be recognised as strategic partners in designing Europe’s climate response, not merely as implementers on the ground.  

The summit echoes the key messages of CEMR’s position paper “Adapting Together – A territorial approach to resilience and risk management”, published in February 2026. In this position paper, CEMR makes a case for a territorial approach to climate resilience, grounded in multi-level governance. A fundamental gap is highlighted: local and regional governments already implement most adaptation measures, yet their role remains insufficiently recognised and supported in EU and national frameworks.  

To close this gap, CEMR continues to flag six priorities:  

  1. Empowering local and regional governments with clear mandates and flexibility to act 
  1. Strengthening local capacity through better access to data and peer learning 
  1. Securing predictable and accessible funding for adaptation investments 
  1. Improving preparedness and disaster risk management 
  1. Restoring ecosystems and scaling nature-based solutions 
  1. Ensuring water resilience through integrated, locally driven water management 

The summit organised by Climate Chance came at a critical political moment. The European Commission is currently developing a new integrated framework for European Climate Resilience and Risk Management, expected to be adopted in the second half of 2026.  

Ronan Dantec, CEMR Spokesperson for Climate: “Climate adaptation will only succeed if local and regional governments are recognised as full partners in the future resilience framework. Territories need a common trajectory, the tools to understand their vulnerabilities and the long-term funding to turn resilience into reality.” 

Discussions at the summit on multi-level governance, funding adaptation and resilience at local level, technical support for LRG to prepare risk management strategies and investments, and solidarity mechanisms all reinforced what our position paper argues: coherent and effective climate action requires local and regional governments at the table from the very beginning — in the design, financing and monitoring of policy, not just its delivery. 

The summit closed with the adoption of the Brussels Declaration of European Non-State Actors on Climate Change Adaptation, signed by a wide range of local government networks, economic actors networks, and NGOs, including: Eurocities, FEDARENE and Association internationale des maires francophones (AIMF). 

It commits all signatories to playing an active role in shaping Europe’s climate resilience policies and calls for adaptation to be built into every level of decision-making, from EU policy down to local plans. 

CEMR will continue to push this message forward in the lead-up to the adoption of the EU framework by the end of the year. Europe’s resilience starts in its territories. 

Connie Heedegard, Chair of the Climate Adaptation Mission and former Commissioner for Climate Action: “Adaptation is crucial for resilience, but it is also key for citizens safety. The EU Adaptation Mission has laid the foundations; now is the time to harvest the fruits and scale up implementation.” 

Read our position paper Adapting Together – A territorial approach to resilience and risk management  

For more information, contact:

New MFF: EU funding and water 

Climate - Water management

Webinar report: EU funding opportunities for water resilience in local governments


How can towns, cities and regions secure the investments needed to strengthen water resilience in the face of climate change, ageing infrastructure and growing regulatory requirements?

On 13 May 2026, CEMR and Aqua Publica Europea (APE) hosted a webinar bringing together representatives from the European Commission, the European Investment Bank (EIB), local and regional governments, and public water operators to discuss EU funding opportunities for water resilience.

The discussions highlighted both the opportunities available under the current EU budget and the challenges that local and regional governments may face under the future Multiannual Financial Framework (MFF). The key messages and recommendations from the event are now available in a new webinar report jointly published by CEMR and APE.

Water resilience starts locally

Opening the webinar, Andrea Carli, CEMR spokesperson for Environment and Regional Councillor of Friuli Venezia Giulia, highlighted the growing pressures facing towns, cities and regions across Europe. From droughts and water scarcity to flooding, local and regional governments are increasingly at the forefront of climate adaptation while also facing rising investment needs.

For CEMR, this reinforces the need for strong governance frameworks, technical support and sufficient financial resources to ensure sustainable and affordable water services for all communities.

Financing remains the key challenge

A central message emerging from the discussions is clear: financing remains the main barrier to achieving Europe’s water policy objectives.

APE and CEMR highlight the significant investment gap identified by the European Commission, while also pointing to governance and capacity challenges that can limit access to available funding. Although water resilience has been recognised as a priority area in the mid-term review of cohesion policy, many local and regional governments and water operators continue to struggle to secure the resources needed for critical investments.

Looking ahead to the next MFF

With negotiations on the next Multiannual Financial Framework (MFF) underway, the webinar explored how the proposed future funding architecture could affect water investments.

While the new National and Regional Partnership Plans (NRPP) may offer greater flexibility, they also raise important questions about the involvement of local and regional governments in setting investment priorities. CEMR continues to advocate for a strong cohesion policy and meaningful participation of towns, cities and regions in shaping and implementing the future EU budget.

New opportunities through the EIB

During the webinar, participants also heard about EIB’s growing role in supporting water investments, including the forthcoming Sustainable Water Advisory Facility. The initiative aims to help local and regional governments and water operators access financing and advisory support more easily, strengthening the preparation and delivery of water projects across Europe.

As discussions on the future EU budget continue, achieving Europe’s water resilience objectives will require long-term investment, strong local governance and a central role for towns, cities and regions.

Read the webinar report to discover the main conclusions from the discussion, the latest funding opportunities, policy developments and recommendations for local and regional governments.

Read the article on APE´s website here: APE and CEMR host webinar on EU funding opportunities for Water Resilience | Aqua Publica Europea

 Check the presentations used during the event:

For more information, contact:

Protecting Europe’s water future

Water Management - Best Practices

CEMR calls for the timely implementation of the Urban Wastewater Treatment Directive (UWWTD)


The Council of European Municipalities and Regions (CEMR) call on Members of the European Parliament to support the timely and effective implementation of the revised Urban Wastewater Treatment Directive (UWWTD).

The Directive introduces a new treatment step for the removal of micropollutants from urban wastewater, a major requirement to protect public health and the environment. Its Extended Producer Responsibility (EPR) scheme ensures that the contributors to these pollutants cover at least 80% of the related treatment costs.

For local and regional governments, this mechanism is crucial to uphold the polluter-pays principle and to avoid placing the financial burden of quaternary treatment on users. The Directive already includes safeguards to address concerns around medicine affordability, supply and accessibility, as well as mechanisms for monitoring and adjustment once implementation begins.

CEMR firmly opposes proposals to suspend or delay the EPR provisions. Such a suspension would undermine long-term investment planning in wastewater infrastructure, increase uncertainty, and put essential public services at risk.

Local and regional authorities are already preparing investments to meet the Directive’s requirements. A stable regulatory environment is essential to safeguard public health, environmental protection, and Europe’s long-term competitiveness.

CEMR calls on EU decision-makers to move forward with implementation as agreed and to use the Directive’s existing review mechanisms to make any necessary adjustments based on data collected during the implementation process.

Learn more about CEMR action on water protection:

CEMR and partners’ joint call to MEPs to swiftly implement the recast of UWWTD

Protecting Clean Water

CEMR Policy paper on Urban Wastewater Treatment Directive

For more information, contact:

Climate adaptation position paper

ODELL - City of Bilbao, main banner

CEMR calls for a territorial approach to Europe’s climate resilience


Europe is the fastest-warming continent in the world. Heatwaves, floods, droughts and extreme weather events are already affecting communities, infrastructure and ecosystems across the continent — with impacts that vary widely from one territory to another. In this context, climate adaptation has become an urgent priority for towns, cities and regions, which are on the frontline maintaining essential services and strengthening resilience on the ground. 

While the European Commission is currently developing a new integrated framework for European Climate Resilience and Risk Management, CEMR has published a new policy paper, Adapting Together – A territorial approach to resilience and risk management, setting out concrete recommendations to strengthen Europe’s approach to climate adaptation and preparedness. 

A new policy paper: Adapting Together 

The policy paper highlights a clear reality: local and regional governments already implement the vast majority of adaptation measures, yet their role remains insufficiently recognised and supported in EU and national frameworks. The paper calls for a territorial approach to climate resilience, grounded in multi-level governance and built around six key priorities: 

  • Empowering local and regional governmentswith clear mandates and flexibility to act; 
  • Strengthening local capacity through better access to data, tools and peer learning; 
  • Securing predictable and accessible funding for adaptation investments; 
  • Improving preparedness and disaster risk management; 
  • Restoring ecosystems and scaling up nature-based solutions; 
  • Ensuring water resilience through integrated, locally driven water management. 

By combining horizontal enablers (governance, capacity and finance) with sector-specific recommendations, the paper demonstrates how empowering towns, cities and regions is essential to Europe’s overall resilience. 

Towns, cities and regions at the frontline of adaptation policies  

Ronan Dantec, CEMR spokesperson for Climate, underlines: “Today, it is urgent to recognise that adaptation to climate change is pivotal for municipalities and regions of all sizes. Investing in sustainable infrastructure and using our resources more efficiently is not just an option, but an imperative for securing a thriving future for all.” 

Climate impacts are inherently local. Even within the same country, risks can differ significantly between urban and rural areas, coastal and inland regions, or northern and southern territories. Towns, cities and regions are therefore best placed to: 

  • Assess local climate risks and vulnerabilities; 
  • Protect vulnerable populations; 
  • Plan and manage resilient infrastructure; 
  • Ensure continuity of essential services such as water, transport and energy; 
  • Deliver nature-based solutions and ecosystem restoration. 

Their proximity to citizens also allows them to integrate social resilience into adaptation policies, ensuring that no one is left behind as climate impacts intensify. 

Preparing for the EU’s upcoming integrated framework on climate resilience 

CEMR’s policy paper comes at a key political moment, as the new integrated framework for European ClimateResilience and Risk Management is expected to be adopted by the European Commission in the second half of 2026. It will aim to establish a comprehensive and coherent EU approach to climate resilience and preparedness.  

 The ongoing public consultation of the European Commission on the future integrated framework, includes a set of questions covering resilience-by-design across EU policies; harmonised and comparable climate risk assessments; funding for adaptation; support for local and regional level, consideration of climate-related health impacts.  

CEMR is currently developing a response in cooperation with its expert group, requesting that towns, cities and regions are recognised not only as implementers, but as strategic partners in the design, financing and monitoring of this future framework. The consultation is open until 23 February 2026. CEMR encourages its members to participate and make their voices heard. 


For more information contact:

On the EU Water Resilience Strategy

Head Banner - SUN4UKRAINE

CEMR priorities on the European Commission Water Resilience Strategy


The European Commission has just published its Water Resilience Strategy, a much-needed step toward safeguarding one of our most vital common goods.

At CEMR, we welcome the Strategy’s alignment with many of our long-standing priorities:
✅ Recognition of water as a public good
✅ Acknowledgement of the role of multi-level governance, cross-border cooperation and stakeholder engagement
✅ Emphasis on nature-based solutions, including the new Sponge Facility
✅ Improved tools for data access, drought management, and awareness-raising

We also welcome the reinforcement of the Polluter Pays Principle, especially for persistent pollutants like PFAS. However, we are particularly concerned by the provision for an updated study on the costs and potential impacts of the Extended Producer Responsibility (EPR) scheme under the Urban Wastewater Treatment Directive.

As addressed in our recent joint letter to President von der Leyen decision risks delaying the deployment of quaternary treatment technologies essential to remove micropollutants and could hinder the timely implementation of the recast Directive.

We strongly believe that local and regional governments are best placed to address water challenges — but to do so effectively, they must be empowered with the tools, flexibility, and funding they need.

The Strategy would benefit from:
🔹 Clear and firm commitment to dedicated funding for water management in the next MFF
🔹 Better access to emergency EU funds for municipalities and regions affected by extreme events
🔹 Stronger legal safeguards and technical support for public sector water services
🔹 Concrete support for urban-rural cooperation in integrated water management

Read our full position paper

These issues will be front and centre at the CEMR Leaders’ Summit in Oslo, 23–24 June, under the theme: “Local Solutions for Equitable and Sustainable Resource Management.”

Let’s ensure Europe’s water resilience starts where it matters most — in our cities and regions.