Skip to main content

Climate and energy resilience: mayors meet EU leaders 

Covenant of Mayors 2026

Mayors meet with EU leaders in Brussels to advance affordable energy and climate resilience 

1,072 words
5–7 minutes

Against a backdrop of rising energy costs and growing climate risks, hundreds of mayors gathered in Brussels for the annual EU Covenant of Mayors Ceremony. As part of the consortium responsible of implementing the EU Covenant of Mayors, CEMR contributed to bringing together European leaders and local elected representatives to discuss how to make energy more affordable, strengthen resilience, and protect people’s quality of life across Europe. 

Local governments are on the front line of today’s successive crises. Through their climate and energy plans, signatories of the EU Covenant of Mayors have been working for over a decade to transform their energy systems and territories, making them cleaner, safer and better prepared for the challenges ahead. 

Their experience makes them essential partners in delivering on the EU’s priorities, from energy security to affordable living and climate resilience. The Ceremony provided an opportunity to discuss in concrete terms how European policies and investment can help cities turn their ambitions into reality. 

“We are together on this. I am with you and will work with you. We have a very important duty: to build a resilient, low emission and fair future, and your cities are the place to start delivering.” – Teresa Ribera, European Commission Executive Vice-President for a Clean, Just and Competitive Transition 

Covenant of Mayors 2026 - Teresa Ribera
Covenant of Mayors 2026 – Teresa Ribera

As Europe faces a challenging energy and climate landscape, making everyday life safe and affordable has become a shared priority for the EU and its cities. By working together to advance the energy and climate transition, they are helping ensure that a decent quality of life is accessible and affordable for everyone. 

This is at the heart of the EU Covenant of Mayors’ new action, Places Made for People, launched at today’s Ceremony: supporting local governments in shaping places where people can live and thrive today and for generations to come.   

Local homegrown energy means greater security and affordability 

Reducing Europe’s exposure to volatile international energy markets means reducing Europe’s dependence on imported fossil fuels. This requires a faster shift to homegrown renewable energy and electrification. The EU’s Electrification Action Plan sets out the bloc’s ambition to make Europe the world’s first fully electrified continent.   

“Europe needs its cities, towns and regions more than ever. To deliver climate neutrality.  To reinforce our security, our competitiveness, and our energy independence. And to ensure that the transition is fair, affordable and democratic. In all of these areas, we can only succeed through local action that delivers local results.” – Dan Jørgensen, European Commissioner for Energy and Housing 

Covenant of Mayors 2026 - Dan Jørgensen
Covenant of Mayors 2026 – Dan Jørgensen

Cities have a central role in making this happen on the ground by expanding renewable energy production, developing clean district heating, and supporting flexibility solutions such as batteries, storage and smart metering.   

From decentralised energy systems helping Ukrainian cities like Lviv to maintain essential services during attacks, to community energy initiatives in Gabrovo, Bulgaria, local action can make energy both more secure and affordable. By diversifying energy production and involving citizens, municipalities can reduce vulnerability to disruptions and bring the benefits of clean energy closer to communities. 

Mayors exchanged views with the European Commission on the significant investments needed to transform local energy systems. In Leuven, renewable energy projects are pooled to make them financially viable. For the roll-out of new district heating and cooling networks, where the business case is often less clear, governments need to step up with public investment to accelerate their development, just as they do for schools and highways. Many mayors are leading this investment and asking for continued support from the European Union. 

Covenant of Mayors 2026 event

Protecting people from climate risks starts locally 

Keeping energy prices stable and affordable is not the only concern for Europeans. This summer’s heatwaves and wildfires made painfully clear that protecting people from the impacts of a changing climate has become even more urgent. Many cities – particularly vulnerable to extreme heat – are already taking action to cool their urban environments, from adapting public spaces and buildings to offering specific protections to vulnerable residents.   

In Matosinhos, €5 million of EU funds is being invested in data collection to better prepare for future risks, involving people in schools, sports clubs and local initiatives. Scaling up these efforts requires both the right tools and sufficient EU funding, with the Covenant of Mayors playing an important role in sharing knowledge and serving as a platform for EU and local alignment. 


As the EU prepares its Framework for Climate Resilience, cooperation with local governments will be crucial. Mayors understand the specific risks their communities face and are responsible for many of the services and infrastructure needed to respond to these. However, planning alone is not enough. Local governments need resources and long-term certainty to invest in adaptation and to prepare their cities for future climate impacts.   

“The past year has shown that every place is vulnerable, that everywhere we can experience atypical weather, droughts and wildfires… It’s important that we address these challenges not in isolation, but by working together across the continent and across political parties.” – Wopke Hoekstra, European Commissioner for Climate, Net Zero and Clean Growth 

Covenant of Mayors 2026 - Wopke Hoekstra
Covenant of Mayors 2026 – Wopke Hoekstra

Europe’s ambitions need local investment 

The EU Covenant Ceremony made one thing clear: cities are already working to advance affordable energy and resilience, protecting populations from energy and climate crises. Maintaining this momentum requires sustained political commitment and investment. 

“Our budget is our future. It should reflect our political ambitions – including our climate targets. We need continued funding for climate action. We need to secure that funding at the European level and, just as importantly, ensure it reaches the local level, where it can make a real difference.” – Emil Boc, mayor of Cluj-Napoca, Romania and EU Covenant of Mayors Board member 

Covenant of Mayors 2026 - Emil Boc
Covenant of Mayors 2026 – Emil Boc

As the EU shapes its future funding and governance frameworks, the question is how to ensure that cities have the means to deliver on shared European goals. Stable funding, policies that support local investment, and meaningful cooperation between European, national and local authorities are essential to making progress at the pace the current crises demand. 

“The new EU Agenda for cities provides a framework for sustainable and urban development, helping cities shape EU policies, making EU support more accessible regardless of the size of the city.” – Raffaele Fitto, European Commission Executive Vice-President for Cohesion and Reforms.

For more information, contact:

Territorial dimension in the future Cohesion Policy 

Future of Cohesion event 2026

CEMR and the German Association for Housing, Urban and Spatial Development (DV) hosted a discussion on the role of the territorial dimension in the future Cohesion Policy 

973 words
4–6 minutes

On 12 October, during the European Week of Regions and Cities 2026, the Council of European Municipalities and Regions (CEMR) and the German Association for Housing, Urban and Spatial Development (DV), with the support of the German Federal Ministry for Housing, Urban Development and Building (BMWSB), brought together policymakers, practitioners and elected representatives to discuss how to strengthen the territorial dimension of the next EU Cohesion Policy. 

Future of Cohesion event - Speakers
Speakers of the event (from left to right): Claragh Mulhern, Tilman Buchholz, Raquel Garcia Hermida-van der Walle, Christoph Schnaudigel, Renata Calak, Arjen Gerritsen, Matija Kovač

With the negotiations on the 2028-2034 Multiannual Financial Framework (MFF) still ongoing, Member States are already advancing their National and Regional Partnership Plans (NRPPs). In this perspective, as no earmark has been foreseen by the European Commission to promote the use of Integrated Territorial approaches such as Integrated Territorial Investments (ITI), Community-Led Local Development (CLLD/LEADER) and other similar tools, CEMR and DV focused the main debate on this matter.  

“The Territorial Dimension and its place-based instruments can build on regional strengths through intermunicipal cooperation across the rural-urban continuum. They can make the benefits of European investment visible in everyday life, foster economic innovation and resilience, and bring Europe closer to its citizens.” Dr. Rene Peter Hohmann, Executive Director DV’s EU-Office.

An “operational” and not “symbolical” multilevel governance is needed  

Opening the event, CEMR President Christoph Schnaudigel, who is also President of the County of Karlsruhe, called the territorial dimension “not a technical addition to Cohesion Policy” but “a core condition for its success”. He warned that a simpler policy on paper could be less effective in practice if it ignores how differently climate transition, demographic change, affordable housing and access to services play out in a capital city, a small municipality, an island or a mountain area.  

He also stressed that partnership and multilevel governance “must be operational, not symbolic”, and that local and regional governments must be genuine partners in preparing, implementing and monitoring the NRPPs rather than only delivery contractors. 

The case of Celje (Slovenia): an example of how to include the territorial dimension 

Following those words, Matija Kovač, the Mayor of Celje (Slovenia), showed how the territorial dimension works in his town. “The ITI (Integrated Territorial Investment) in Celje is a good example of multi-level governance that is actually run by the cities and for the cities, and, of course, building on two programming periods’ experience since 2014, it has also built strong trust between the national organs, ministries, and the municipalities”, he said at the event.

“I think it is also a new way to include our knowledge and organisation in helping the national states to move on with the territorial decision.”


Predictability, flexibility, formal mechanisms for the NRPPs… different views in one high-level debate 

The high-level discussion, “Quo Vadis Cohesion Policy?”, brought together policy makers from the European, national and regional levels, as well as MEPs and local elected representatives 

According to Arjen Gerritsen, King’s Commissioner of Flevoland and CEMR spokesperson on the EU budget, the future funding architecture must deliver certainty, respect for territorial diversity, and support for integrated investments. He argued that Cohesion funding must remain identifiable and predictable within the NRPPs. 

“We need predictable regional resources, mandatory regional coverage (or chapters), stronger territorial tools, and the right enabling conditions. Together, these elements can help ensure that the Cohesion Policy continues to support economic, social and territorial cohesion across all European regions”, he added.    

Renata Calak, Director of the Strategy Department in the Ministry of Funds and Regional Policy in Poland, presented the first national perspective and stressed that “the new framework offers [Poland] both challenges and opportunities. ITIs are not foreseen in the new framework, but [Poland] will create [its] own national instrument to continue the work done on territorial approaches.” 

Future of Cohesion event - Speakers roundtable
Roundtable discussion, speakers (from left to right): Raquel Garcia Hermida-van der Walle, Arjen Gerritsen, Renata Calak, Claragh Mulhern, Anna Wagner

Following the Polish example, Claragh Mulhern, the Principal Adviser in the National Strategic Planning Department of Housing in Ireland, presented the Irish stance.  

“In Ireland, we have undertaken a spatial strategy involving a balanced territorial approach. We look at everything across the broad in a coherent strategy, cross-sectors providing an opportunity at a national level to look at what those interventions might be across the country.”

The discussion later turned into a brief debate between Commissioner Anna Wagner, Head of Unit, Regional and Urban Policy, and the Member of the European Parliament Raquel Garcia Hermida-van der Walle.  

While Wagner stressed that “the territorial dimension is anchored in the future framework through the European semester process and that for the first time there is a systematic and detailed territorial analysis, that will guide the national and regional partnership plans”, Garcia Hermida-van der Walle reiterated that “the partnership principle, multilevel governance, and the need of the local and regional governments in shared management need to be in the legal text, [as so far it is simply not in it]”. “It needs to be something that if member states don’t abide by the Commission will have to intervene”, she added. 

Future of Cohesion event - Last speaker
Future of Cohesion event, speaker: Tilman Buchholz

The event was wrapped up by Tilman Buchholz of the BMWSB, who reflected on a shared ambition to build a European coalition for balanced, integrated territorial approaches linking cities with their surrounding areas and complementing urban and rural development, as the MFF and NRPP negotiations move forward. 

CEMR will continue to work with the European institutions, Member States and partners to ensure that Europe’s future investment policy is built on the knowledge, legitimacy and capacity of its territories. 

For more information, contact:

Webinar: Costs of climate and natural disaster risks

Climate disasters - News 2026

CEMR hosts a discussion on the evolving insurance landscape and its implications for local public finances

673 words
3–4 minutes

As climate-related disasters become a structural part of our reality, their financial consequences are placing growing pressure on local and regional budgets. By bringing together voices from local governments in Europe and Canada, European institutions and the insurance sector, CEMR led a webinar on 6 October on the evolving insurance landscape and its implications for local public finances.  

The diversity of perspectives reflected the reality that climate risks do not respect administrative boundaries, and neither should the search for solutions. Opening the webinar, Federica Bordelot, CEMR Director for Policy, stressed that local and regional governments are facing rising insurance premiums, tighter coverage conditions and, in some cases, difficulties obtaining insurance for certain assets or activities. With climate insurance rapidly moving up the European policy agenda, Bordelot emphasised the importance of fully involving local and regional governments in the discussions. 

“Climate risks materialise locally, and public infrastructure is managed locally and resilience in the end is built locally. There cannot be one-size-fits-all” – Federica Bordelot 

CEMR webinar 2026
CEMR webinar 2026

Ronan Dantec, Senator for Loire-Atlantique, France, and CEMR Spokesperson on Climate, pointed out the importance of solidarity and risk-sharing in the face of growing climate risks. Dantec recalled that “insurance is fundamentally based on pooling risks” and called for financial resources to be mobilised upstream to support adaptation and more resilient territories. He also highlighted the need for long-term financing mechanisms for local and regional governments. 

“We are probably at a level of financial effort [on the scale of adaptation needs] that corresponds to [those] after World War II.” – Ronan Dantec 

Understanding the insurance protection gap 

Opening the panel discussion, Pantelis Marinakis from the European Environment Agency explained the growing climate insurance protection gap. Marinakis stressed that climate risks are systemic and can cascade through households, businesses, banks, insurers and public finances. He also presented insurance as part of a broader resilience approach and identified key priorities to close the protection gap, including increasing risk awareness and transparency, preserving affordable insurance, expanding risk-bearing capacity and strengthening public-private partnerships. 

“The most durable way to keep insurance available and affordable is to reduce future losses through adaptation measures.” – Pantelis Marinakis 

Marien Ferdinandusse from the Public Finance Division of the European Central Bank highlighted what a growing climate insurance protection gap means for public finances. When losses are uninsured, governments can ultimately become risk-bearers, while insurance helps households and businesses rebuild after extreme weather events. As climate risks increase, he underlined the need to move from a reactive to a more proactive approach through adaptation, fiscal preparedness, and measures to reduce the insurance protection gap. 

Local and insurance sector perspectives 

Louise Wallace-Richmond, Councillor in the City of Salmon Arm in British Columbia, Canada, brought an international perspective to the discussion. Drawing on her municipality’s experience, she highlighted the impacts of disasters on local infrastructure, budgets and communities. She put emphasis on clarifying responsibilities between levels of government, maintaining affordable insurance and protecting essential infrastructure. 

Sibylle Steimen from Allianz brought the insurance sector perspective, stressing the importance of maintaining the broadest possible insurance market. She underlined the need to better inform customers about their exposure to risks and identified prevention and adaptation as essential to keeping insurance available and affordable. Steimen also pointed out that local adaptation measures can have a positive effect on insurance premiums. 

As discussions turned to possible solutions to the climate insurance protection gap, participants exchanged on the role of adaptation, the impact of local measures on insurance premiums and the need for cooperation between public authorities and the insurance sector. 

The recording of the webinar is available here. CEMR will continue exchanging with its members, engaging with the European Commission and supporting knowledge-sharing on this topic, especially as the European Commission is about to release an integrated framework for European climate resilience and risk management: the ‘Climate Insurance Alliance’. This webinar feeds into the future work and positioning of CEMR on these important initiatives.  

For more information, contact:

The post-2030 Scenarios

Beyond 2030: How can territories help shape the future of sustainable development? 

1,174 words
5–7 minutes

On 5 October, CEMR and PLATFORMA brought together almost 100 participants from over 50 countries for a public webinar on the future of the global sustainable development framework beyond 2030. The discussion gathered voices from research, civil society, women’s organisations and local government to answer one question: how can territories really be at the heart of the post-2030 framework? 

Eleven years after the adoption of the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs), many targets remain off track. The webinar, which followed CEMR spokespersons’ debate in June, examined lessons from SDG implementation and emerging challenges, from climate risks to technological disruption and geopolitical tensions, that will shape the next agenda. 

Opening the meeting, Fabrizio Rossi, CEMR Secretary General, stressed that the SDGs remain the world’s most important shared political framework, but that implementation will only succeed if it is localised. Local and regional governments are not merely implementers of global agendas: they are political actors that turn commitments into services, investments and policies, and must be recognised as strategic partners and co-architects of the next agenda. He also called for better local data to anticipate risks, and for gender equality to move from commitment to leadership. 

“The SDGs remain the world’s most important shared political framework, but implementation will only succeed if it is localised.

The local and regional governments should be part of the discussions; they should be at the table, not solely the implementers.” – Fabrizio Rossi 

Four possible scenarios after 2030 

Axel Berger, Deputy Director of the German Institute of Development and Sustainability (IDOS), opened the discussion with a keynote on a global sustainability agenda beyond 2030. He recalled that the SDGs have delivered real progress: 92% of the world’s population now has access to electricity, 74% of people were online in 2025 (up from 40% in 2015), and 134 countries have already met the target on under-5 child mortality.  

Yet an implementation gap remains, driven by successive shocks and conflicts, a financing gap of around $4 trillion a year in developing countries, a weak implementation architecture, and eroding political ownership and trust. 

“The debate should move from the number of goals to purpose and delivery, with resilience, new alliances and a role for subnational actors.”

Berger stressed that negotiations on a successor agenda will take place in a harder context than in 2015, marked by multipolarity, low trust and overlapping crises, which makes an inclusive and trust-building process even more important.

“At the moment, we are putting an emphasis on issues like competitiveness and security, and the SDGs in the Agenda 2030 falls to the wayside.”   

Berger presented four possible paths: continuing the SDGs, extending them with new goals, reducing the number of goals, or building a new vision focused on delivery, resilience and new alliances, including the role of subnational actors. With the SDG Summit in September 2027 meant to launch the process, he called for negotiations that are inclusive, transparent, science-based and learning-oriented. 

“Beyond pushing forward on SDG implementation, what we urgently need to do between now and September 2027 – and well beyond – is to build progressive alliances with like-minded nations and stakeholders.” – Axel Berger 


Perspectives from civil society, research and women’s organisations 

Jyotsna Mohan Singh, Advocacy Officer at Forus International, a network representing more than 24,000 civil society organisations, argued that putting territories at the heart means shifting power, resources and decision-making closer to people, not only localising implementation. She underlined the complementary roles of local governments, civil society and communities, including civil society’s independent accountability role, and presented Voluntary Local Reviews as a way to connect local evidence to budgets, national reviews and global accountability. 

“Putting territories at the heart of the post-2030 framework should not mean simply asking territories to do more. It should mean giving territories, and the people within them, a greater voice, greater resources and greater influence over the decisions that affect their lives.”  

“Local governments are not simply the last mile of implementation. They are important governance actors, with knowledge of what works, what does not work, and what people actually need.” – Dr Jyotsna Mohan Singh

João Tavares, Co-Founder and CEO of Nexus Governance, presented an analysis of 474 Voluntary Local Reviews from 359 cities in 72 countries. He pointed out that the local reviews are becoming more candid: challenges rose from 11% to 29% of reported items between 2017 and 2025. Cities name financing, institutional capacity and coordination across government tiers as their main barriers. In Europe, 45% of commitments are concrete, compared with 50% worldwide.  

“Cities have already written the evidence. What we have done is make it countable: 474 local reviews, from 359 cities in 72 countries.”  

“Local reviews are becoming more honest. Challenges have gone from 11% to 29% of what cities report, led by the most vulnerable territories.” – Joao Tavares


Gabriele Köhler, Board Member of Women Engage for a Common Future (WECF), warned of a global retrogression on women’s rights, with austerity and militarisation displacing social spending. She highlighted the intersecting inequalities and structural barriers, such as unequal access to resources and time poverty, that limit women’s representation and leadership. She also called for building CEDAW and Universal Periodic Review recommendations into SDG 5 accountability in a post-2030 framework. 

“We need to look at the really disaggregated level to see what is happening to women and girls from disadvantaged communities, which can be anything from where they are located to their citizenship, sexual orientation, gender identity, or ethnicity.” 

“I think that beyond 2030, what we really need to think about is binding accountability.” – Gabriele Köhler 


The meeting was also joined by CEMR spokesperson on SDGs, Carola Gunnarsson, the Councillor of Sala Municipality and the Swedish Association of Local Authorities and Regions (SALAR).  

“Trust is perhaps the most important resource we have for managing transformation.”  

“If we can strengthen those partnerships and keep people at the centre of decision making, then local and regional governments will not only implement future global goals, but they will also help shape it being them.” – Carola Gunnarsson  


Four key asks from local and regional governments 

Closing the webinar, Boris Tonhauser, Director of PLATFORMA, stressed that the question is no longer whether territories matter for sustainable development, but whether the next framework will empower them to help shape decisions, not just implement them. He recalled the key asks that will structure the CEMR-PLATFORMA position: 

  • Put multilevel governance into practice, giving local and regional governments a defined role in shaping, implementing and reviewing the future framework 
  • Reflect the interconnections of today’s challenges, addressing climate, inequality, demographic change, digital transformation and peace and security in an integrated way 
  • Match ambitions with means of implementation, ensuring access to finance, capacities, data and knowledge 
  • Strengthen international and decentralised cooperation, recognising the contribution of local governments to global sustainable development 

“The question is no longer whether territories matter for sustainable development. The real challenge is whether the post-2030 framework will empower local and regional governments to help shape decisions, not just implement them.”  

“If sustainable development happens in territories, then territories must have a seat at the decision-making table. This means moving from a model of consultation to a model of genuine co-creation and shared governance.” – Boris Tonhauser 

For more information, contact:

State of the Union: Local Alliance letter

Climate Change News

Local Alliance calls for a stronger role for towns, cities and regions in EU reforms ahead of SOTEU

342 words
1–2 minutes

A day ahead of President Ursula von der Leyen’s State of the European Union (SOTEU), CEMR has joined Local Alliance, which comprises seven other leading European networks of local and regional governments including ACR+, Climate Alliance, Energy Cities, Eurocities, FEDARENE, ICLEI Europe and POLIS, in a joint letter reaffirming support for a more competitive, resilient and cohesive Union, while raising a clear warning about the direction EU reforms are taking.

The letter recalls the summer’s wildfires and heatwaves, during which towns, cities and regions coordinated evacuations, sheltered residents and led recovery efforts. It is a reminder, Local Alliance writes, that cities and regions are not mere implementers of EU policy: they carry out close to 70% of EU legislation and account for around 68% of climate-significant public investment across the EU and OECD countries.

The signatories warn that the Commission’s envisaged restructuring of its services, the next Multiannual Financial Framework and ongoing simplification efforts risk removing both the institutional dialogue and the financial channels through which local and regional governments engage with the Union. Streamlining EU governance is welcome, the Local Alliance stressed, but not if it comes at the cost of centralisation, weaker locally led transitions, or a thinner territorial dimension in EU policy and funding.

The letter also points to the local dimension of Europe’s other priorities: security, economy and enlargement, noting that towns, cities and regions integrate people fleeing war, sustain partnerships with Ukrainian towns that will matter even more during reconstruction, and are where enlargement will ultimately be felt by citizens in candidate countries.

The ask is simple. The Local Alliance calls on President von der Leyen to use her State of the Union address to reaffirm the Commission’s commitment to local and regional governments as trusted, indispensable partners with a strong Commission service that engages with them directly, and an EU budget that gives them the investment and capacity to deliver for every community.

For more information, contact:

Joint letter on Climate Resilience

Letter on Climate resilience

Joint letter to President von der Leyen on Climate Resilience

600 words
3–4 minutes

After a series of natural disasters this summer, CEMR joins 30+ organisations call on the front line of floods, droughts, wildfires, mate disasters.  

Two days ahead of the State of the European Union address, the Council of European Municipalities and Regions (CEMR) has joined more than 30 organisations representing local and regional governments, sustainable farmers, water providers, healthcare providers and financial service providers in an open letter to European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen. The letter urges her to make nature-based solutions the first line of defence against climate disasters, and to embed this ambition in the upcoming European Framework for Climate Resilience. 

A summer that exposed Europe’s vulnerability 

The letter follows a summer that broke heat records and once again exposed how unprepared Europe is for the climate it already faces. Western Europe recorded its hottest June–July period since records began, with severe wildfires sweeping across the continent. At least 35,000 excess deaths have been linked to this summer’s back-to-back heatwaves, a figure that does not even include August, meaning the true toll is likely higher still. 

For local and regional governments, who are on the front line of responding to floods, droughts, wildfires and heatwaves, these are not abstract statistics. They translate directly into strained emergency services, damaged infrastructure, and communities left exposed. 

Restoring nature to restore resilience 

The signatories point to a common root cause behind Europe’s intensifying climate risks: the degradation of landscapes, soils and water systems. Wetlands, floodplains, peatlands, healthy soils, coastal ecosystems and forests naturally store water, recharge aquifers, regulate temperatures and buffer extreme events. Yet, these systems have been steadily lost or degraded across the continent, leaving communities exposed to increasingly volatile cycles of flooding, drought and heat. 

The letter calls the Commission to: 

  • Make the systemic integration of nature-based solutions a key priority in the legislative part of the European Framework for Climate Resilience;  
  • Provide legal incentives and financing mechanisms so that Member States manage landscapes and water systems to prioritise resilience, including national targets for natural water retention delivered through locally driven approaches that reflect territorial needs and capacities. 

This last point matters greatly for CEMR’s members: it recognises that effective climate adaptation must be designed and delivered at the local and regional level, where the knowledge of territorial needs and the capacity to act actually sit. 

A moment for action 

“Europe’s recent summers have shown that climate resilience can no longer be treated as a problem for the future. The Commission has acknowledged the vital role that nature-based solutions play in protecting communities and ecosystems from climate disasters. With the interservice consultation on the European Framework for Climate Resilience expected to begin before the end of September, now is the moment to ensure that this recognition is translated into the legislation itself,” said Claire Baffert, Senior EU Policy Officer, Water & Climate Change Adaptation at WWF EU, speaking on behalf of the 30+ signatories. 

President von der Leyen has herself acknowledged the stakes: in her State of the Union speech last year, she warned that climate change is making summers hotter, harsher and more dangerous, and that Europe must radically step up its efforts on resilience, adaptation and nature-based solutions. In July, she confirmed in writing to MEPs that nature-based solutions play an essential role in adapting to heatwaves, droughts, and floods. 

CEMR and its co-signatories are now calling on the Commission to turn that recognition into law and to give local and regional governments the tools, incentives and financing they need to lead the way. 

For more information, contact:

Localising the Sustainable Development Goals in Europe

Reference Framework for Sustainable Cities - image 1

European territories localise the SDGs: cities at the core of implementation

613 words
3–4 minutes

With less than four years remaining to achieve the 2030 Agenda, a new CEMR–PLATFORMA report highlights a clear message from local and regional governments across Europe: sustainable development will only succeed if cities, towns and regions are placed at the centre of decision-making, financing and implementation.

Published by the Council of European Municipalities and Regions (CEMR) and PLATFORMA at the occasion of the High-Level Political Forum on Sustainable Development (HLPF), the 2026 edition of the report European territories localise the SDGs: Cities at the core of the implementation examines how local and regional governments are contributing to the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) and what is needed to accelerate progress during the final stretch to 2030.

The study is based on a survey of 23 respondents from 17 countries, including associations of local and regional governments from 15 EU Member States and two non-EU countries.

Local action is essential for global goals

The report comes at a pivotal moment. As both the UN New Urban Agenda and the Urban Agenda for the EU reach their tenth anniversary, local and regional governments are reaffirming their indispensable role in translating global ambitions into concrete results on the ground.

From mobility and housing to climate resilience and social inclusion, towns, cities and regions are responsible for many of the policies that directly affect residents’ daily lives. According to the report, SDG implementation is not primarily a technical matter but a political one, requiring trust, resources and authority to be devolved to the territorial level.

The publication places particular emphasis on SDG 11 – Sustainable Cities and Communities, one of the goals under review at the 2026 HLPF. It argues that sustainable urban development cannot be achieved without strong local democracy, effective multi-level governance and meaningful involvement of subnational authorities in national and international decision-making processes.

Six recommendations to accelerate SDG implementation

Drawing on the experience of local and regional governments, the report puts forward six recommendations addressed to the United Nations, the European Union and national governments.

Among its key messages, the study calls for:

  • Reinforcing multi-level governance as a political priority for the 2026–2030 period.
  • Placing the subnational level at the centre of SDG implementation, including stronger participation of local and regional governments in global review processes and improved access to development finance.
  • Reaffirming the importance of the UN New Urban Agenda as the main global framework for sustainable urbanisation.
  • Ensuring that cities and towns remain central to Europe’s sustainable development agenda through stronger alignment between EU and UN urban policy frameworks.
  • Recognising the role of territories in the upcoming EU Multiannual Financial Framework 2028–2034, with more accessible and place-based funding for municipalities and regions.
  • Accelerating the localisation of the SDGs by fully involving local and regional governments in the design and implementation of sustainable development policies.

A contribution to the global SDG debate

Beyond policy recommendations, the report showcases good practices from across Europe and explores how local and regional governments are advancing the goals under review in 2026 (SDG 6 – Clean Water and Sanitation, SDG 7 – Affordable and Clean Energy), SDG 9 – Industry, Innovation, and Infrastructure, and SDG 17 – Partnerships for the Goals). It also includes a dedicated focus on housing and the outcomes of discussions linked to the World Urban Forum, reflecting growing concerns about affordability, inclusion and sustainable urban growth.

As the international community approaches the final years of the 2030 Agenda, the report sends a strong and consistent message: the SDGs will be achieved — or missed — at the local level. Empowering towns, cities and regions with the necessary political mandate, resources and partnerships is therefore not optional, but essential.

Discover this report also online: European Territories Localise the SDGs

For more information, contact:

Lessons learned from the project FOSTER on climate

Climate - News

Climate change impact mitigation: what about the role of participatory democracy? Lessons from the FOSTER Project 


On 9 June 2026, the FOSTER project brought together policymakers, researchers, civil society organisations and citizens from across Europe for an online conference to answer the following question: how can local communities become more resilient to the long-term impacts of climate change through democratic participation? 

Hosted by the partner Foster Europe Foundation, the event offered a unique opportunity to showcase the results achieved throughout the project while fostering a broader discussion on the role of participatory democracy, strategic foresight and collaborative governance in addressing climate-related challenges.

A central part of the event was dedicated to the presentation of the local pathways developed by FOSTER partners: Association of Romanian Municipalities (Romania), Comparative Research Network – CRN (Germany), Foster Europe (Austria),  IASIS (Greece), Istituto per la Ricerca Sociale – IRS (Italy),  NOTUS (Spain), Union of Bulgarian Black Sea Local Authorities – UBBSLA (Bulgaria), with the support of ALDA and CEMR.

Participants had the opportunity to explore the case studies, exchange perspectives and reflect on the lessons learned in the project. The presentations demonstrated how strategic foresight can become a powerful tool for communities to anticipate future challenges and transform them into opportunities for collective action and highlighted both the potential and the challenges of participatory climate governance.

Despite the diversity of local contexts, several common challenges emerged from the case studies. Participants highlighted the increasing vulnerability of urban areas to extreme weather events, the unequal distribution of green infrastructure, the need to protect and regenerate public spaces, and the importance of ensuring that climate adaptation measures also address social inclusion and quality of life.

Strategic foresight as a key tool for engaging with local stakeholders

The FOSTER local pathways demonstrated how participatory foresight can help communities move beyond short-term responses and engage in long-term thinking. Through workshops, scenario-building exercises and co-design activities, citizens, civil society organisations and local authorities worked together to identify future risks and develop locally grounded solutions. These ranged from urban greening interventions and climate-resilient public spaces to sustainable housing strategies, stronger governance mechanisms and new forms of civic participation.

The project also highlighted the importance of building trust between citizens and public institutions. Involving municipal representatives directly in the participatory process helped create constructive dialogue and increased the legitimacy of the proposed solutions. At the same time, participants recognised that maintaining engagement over time remains a challenge. Project’s partners highlighted the phenomenon of “participation fatigue”. Discussions confirmed that citizens are willing to engage in climate-related decision-making when they can clearly understand the purpose of the process and when their contributions are translated into concrete actions.

Another key lesson emerging from the conference and the project was that participatory processes alone are not sufficient. Long-term impact requires institutional commitment, supportive legal frameworks, coordination among stakeholders, and mechanisms that ensure the implementation of the solutions developed collaboratively. As several speakers noted, participation is most effective when it becomes an integral part of governance rather than an isolated project activity.

Together, these contributions reinforced one of the key messages emerging from the FOSTER project: addressing climate change requires governance models that combine long-term thinking, community participation and cross-sector collaboration. Resilient communities are built through inclusive decision-making processes that empower citizens to actively anticipate and shape their futures while co-creating practical and inclusive responses.

Recordings from the Conference:

For more information, contact:

Local Alliance calls to put cities at the heart of Europe’s climate plans

Local Alliance news

Local Alliance calls for a governance overhaul to put cities at the heart of Europe’s climate plans

408 words
2–3 minutes

In a new position paper, the Local Alliance – a coalition of CEMR, ACR+, Climate Alliance, Energy Cities, Eurocities, FEDARENE, ICLEI Europe, and POLIS – calls on the EU to seize the revision of the Governance Regulation to make National Energy and Climate Plans (NECP) truly implementable, investable, and grounded in local realities. 

Cities, towns and regions across Europe are already acting — renovating buildings, deploying renewables, transforming mobility systems. Yet the EU’s climate planning framework has not caught up. National Energy and Climate Plans (NECPs) continue to be drafted largely without the involvement of the local and regional governments that will ultimately deliver them. 

The revision of the Governance Regulation, expected from the European Commission in the last quarter of 2026, is therefore a critical opportunity — one the Local Alliance is determined not to miss. 

A structural disconnect 

A wealth of local data, investment pipelines and climate plans already exists across Europe — from Sustainable Energy and Climate Action Plans to Climate City Contracts and local heating strategies. Yet this territorial knowledge rarely feeds into NECPs, creating duplication, fragmentation and missed investment opportunities.  

Meanwhile, the multi-level dialogues already required under Article 11 of the current Regulation have largely remained disconnected from real implementation decisions or remained tick-the-box level only. 

The result is a dangerous two-speed dynamic: high ambition at European and national levels, too little attention to what happens on the ground. 

The Local Alliance’s answer: connect what already exists 

The position paper calls for the revised Regulation to be built around four mutually reinforcing elements:  

  1. a permanent multi-level dialogue platform in each Member State to align all levels of government around NECP preparation and monitoring, taking into account national governance structures and needs;  
  1. a territorial chapter in each NECP drawing on existing local plans to show where and how national objectives will be delivered;  
  1. territorially informed sectoral pathways linking national targets across buildings, transport, heating, renewable energy, and circular economy with the local realities that determine whether delivery is actually possible; 
  1. and investment strategies that take account of local investment and capacity needs. 

This is not a call for more bureaucracy. It is a call to make what already exists work together — reducing consultation fatigue, cutting administrative duplication, and turning NECPs from reporting exercises into genuine frameworks for implementation and investment. 

Read the full position paper here

For more information, contact:

Climate Chance Summit 2026

Climate Chance Summit 2026

Cities and regions must lead Europe’s climate adaptation 


CEMR participated on 3 and 4 of June in the Climate Chance Europe Summit 2026 organised in Brussels by The Climate Chance association. The two-day event brought together local and regional leaders, European institutions, businesses, NGOs and civil society networks around a shared theme: climate adaptation as a lever for resilience and prosperity in Europe.  

The message shared by the Council of European Municipalities and Regions (CEMR) was that towns, cities and regions must be recognised as strategic partners in designing Europe’s climate response, not merely as implementers on the ground.  

The summit echoes the key messages of CEMR’s position paper “Adapting Together – A territorial approach to resilience and risk management”, published in February 2026. In this position paper, CEMR makes a case for a territorial approach to climate resilience, grounded in multi-level governance. A fundamental gap is highlighted: local and regional governments already implement most adaptation measures, yet their role remains insufficiently recognised and supported in EU and national frameworks.  

To close this gap, CEMR continues to flag six priorities:  

  1. Empowering local and regional governments with clear mandates and flexibility to act 
  1. Strengthening local capacity through better access to data and peer learning 
  1. Securing predictable and accessible funding for adaptation investments 
  1. Improving preparedness and disaster risk management 
  1. Restoring ecosystems and scaling nature-based solutions 
  1. Ensuring water resilience through integrated, locally driven water management 

The summit organised by Climate Chance came at a critical political moment. The European Commission is currently developing a new integrated framework for European Climate Resilience and Risk Management, expected to be adopted in the second half of 2026.  

Ronan Dantec, CEMR Spokesperson for Climate: “Climate adaptation will only succeed if local and regional governments are recognised as full partners in the future resilience framework. Territories need a common trajectory, the tools to understand their vulnerabilities and the long-term funding to turn resilience into reality.” 

Discussions at the summit on multi-level governance, funding adaptation and resilience at local level, technical support for LRG to prepare risk management strategies and investments, and solidarity mechanisms all reinforced what our position paper argues: coherent and effective climate action requires local and regional governments at the table from the very beginning — in the design, financing and monitoring of policy, not just its delivery. 

The summit closed with the adoption of the Brussels Declaration of European Non-State Actors on Climate Change Adaptation, signed by a wide range of local government networks, economic actors networks, and NGOs, including: Eurocities, FEDARENE and Association internationale des maires francophones (AIMF). 

It commits all signatories to playing an active role in shaping Europe’s climate resilience policies and calls for adaptation to be built into every level of decision-making, from EU policy down to local plans. 

CEMR will continue to push this message forward in the lead-up to the adoption of the EU framework by the end of the year. Europe’s resilience starts in its territories. 

Connie Heedegard, Chair of the Climate Adaptation Mission and former Commissioner for Climate Action: “Adaptation is crucial for resilience, but it is also key for citizens safety. The EU Adaptation Mission has laid the foundations; now is the time to harvest the fruits and scale up implementation.” 

Read our position paper Adapting Together – A territorial approach to resilience and risk management  

For more information, contact: