Skip to main content

Generators for Ukraine

generators for Ukraine - News 2023

Call for cities and regions to provide generators for Ukraine


The European Commission and the Committee of the Regions have launched a humanitarian appeal to European cities and regions. Responding to an urgent request from the Ukrainian Government, they call on a joint effort to send energy supplies to Ukraine.

The escalation of Russian attacks on civilian infrastructures and residential buildings has deeply impacted the Ukrainian energy network. In consequence, only 70% of peak demand power can be covered, leaving millions of people without electricity and water in the middle of winter. To strengthen the humanitarian action of Member States and private donors, the Commission is now calling on European regions and cities to provide further assistance. 

Cities and regions can make donations of energy items both new and old, in particular power generators and heaters. The transport costs to the new “rescEU energy” hub in Poland are co-financed by the Union budget. For more information, donors are invited to contact the European Commission.

The European Commission has already been facilitating donations of energy equipment and fuel through the EU Civil Protection Mechanism (UCPM). So far, they have delivered over 55,000 energy items, including 775 power generators, provided by the Member States and private donors. As cities and regions join this common effort, more energy infrastructure will be preserved and restored, helping millions of people regain access to water and electricity.

Local Finances

Local Finance - News 2023

How to unleash local public investments for the green transition


As the EU struggles to find ways to pay for industry transition towards a carbon-free economy, the finances of local governments play an often-neglected role in delivering the needed investments, argues a report by the Council of European Municipalities and Regions (CEMR).

The report retraces the development of local finances over the past decade and how they can influence the ability of municipalities to finance the green transition.

For example, the report found that countries with a more decentralised structure further decentralised their public finances in the past decade, while those with more centralised public spending became even more centralised.

“Federal countries, for example, Germany, went towards more decentralisation,” CEMR’s Vincent Furlan told EURACTIV.

According to the report, this polarisation is relevant because countries with decentralised public finances tend to invest more in the green transition.

“More centralised countries have lost some margin of manoeuvre in terms of investments as a part of their total expenditure,” Furlan said. However, he stressed that this was not necessarily a causal relation between the two as the lower investment appetite of countries with more centralised public finances may be caused by other factors.

Unrelated to centralisation, Furlan stressed that “local and regional governments have a significant weight in investment expenditure”.

“Local and regional governments invest in areas determinant for the green transition.”

For example, local transport infrastructure or waste management facilities are often governed locally and can have a significant environmental impact.

However, municipalities and regions are often constrained in their ability to invest in the green transition as fiscal rules, and the lack of access to financial markets can make it hard for regional governments to undertake the necessary investments.

The issue that too-strict fiscal rules can affect investments has long been a topic of debate at the EU level. However, this debate usually focused on national rather than regional or local, finances. Then, in November this year, the European Commission announced its intention to reform the national fiscal rules and allow member states to invest more in the green transition.

Yet, the local level is often forgotten in these discussions. In a position paper, CEMR argued that the EU’s current fiscal rules constrain local finances since local government debt is included in the calculation of total national debt.

“More flexibility should be granted for local and regional governments, particularly when investing for long-term and sustainable development,” the paper reads.

However, excluding local debt from the national debt calculations could incentivise governments to reallocate their expenditure and their debts to local governments, which might give local governments more leeway to invest, but which also might undermine the effectiveness of the fiscal rules.

Another obstacle to the green investments of local and regional governments is the lack of access to financial markets. In contrast to national governments, local and regional administration cannot count on the same investor appetite for their debt issue and have more difficulty accessing funding.

And as their debt is usually considered riskier, they will also have to pay higher interest rates.

But better access to financial tools might expand the options for local governments to fund themselves. “Because local governments can make a large contribution to the green transition, granting them more access to financial instruments would be beneficial,” Furlan argued.

This article was first published on EURACTIV‘s website.

CERV programme

Twinning - News 2

Discover the next funding opportunities!


Check out the European Commission’s (DG JUST) priorities for 2023 and 2024 and discover the next funding opportunities!

The CERV programme is ​the biggest EU fund ever available for promoting and protecting EU rights and values (1.55 billion over 7 years). Together with the Justice programme (305 million euros over 7 years), it contributes to building a Union of Justice, Rights and Values.

Smarter building rules in Europe

Housing - News

EPBD revision: Local flexibility and long-term planning key to success, say CEMR and Housing Europe


EPBD revision: Local flexibility and long-term planning key to success, say CEMR and Housing Europe 

The Council of European Municipalities and Regions (CEMR) and Housing Europe have joined forces to publish a set of recommendations on the European Commission’s proposal to recast the Energy Performance of Buildings Directive (EPBD). While both organisations fully support the ambition to decarbonise buildings across the EU, they warn that the proposal must better reflect the realities on the ground. 

Local and regional governments, as well as providers of public, social, and cooperative housing, are critical actors in delivering the EU’s climate objectives. But a one-size-fits-all approach will not work. 

The joint position paper outlines three key recommendations: 

  1. Respect local differences through subsidiarity and adaptability 
    The EPBD must allow member states and local authorities to tailor building codes to their own context. Setting EU-level definitions for zero-emission buildings without a clear methodology risks creating uncertainty and undermining national efforts. Other areas, such as fire safety and asbestos removal, should remain the competence of national or local governments. 
  1. Provide a stable and realistic framework for renovations 
    Renovating buildings is a long-term process that requires careful planning. The proposed EPBD introduces tight deadlines and shifting labelling systems, making it nearly impossible for local authorities and property owners to comply effectively. CEMR and Housing Europe argue for a more predictable timeline that reflects labour shortages, market dynamics, and tenant affordability. 
  1. Support zero-emission construction with energy system flexibility 
    While new buildings must meet high standards, member states should retain the freedom to choose their energy sources. That includes not only on-site renewables, but also low-carbon energy from the grid, waste heat, and energy recovery, all in line with the EU waste hierarchy. 

Ultimately, the success of the EPBD will depend on how well it enables local and regional actors to deliver results. CEMR and Housing Europe are clear: the path to climate-neutral buildings must be ambitious but flexible, fair and grounded in local realities

Read the full policy paper here  

For more information, contact: 

EU Enlargement

EU Enlargement - News

Towards a new EU strategy for enlargement


The EU needs to step up the involvement of local and regional authorities of EU Member States and candidate countries in the accession process, states a European Parliament’s report on the new EU strategy for enlargement. It was presented by MEP Tonino Picula at the plenary session in Strasbourg on 22 November. 

During the debate, the Croatian MEP emphasised that in the situation of the Russian invasion of Ukraine, expansion must gain new momentum, be predictable and believable, “as the single most effective EU instrument for securing peace, prosperity and fundamental values on the European continent.”

The rapporteur Mr Picula also added that each candidate for membership must be evaluated according to progress in reforms, especially when it comes to the rule of law, and the judiciary, and that EU support funds should be accessible to candidates for membership before they become full members of the Union.

Regarding Eastern Partnership countries, the Report welcomes the European Council’s exceptionally swift decision on the EU membership applications of Ukraine, the Republic of Moldova and Georgia and calls upon the Commission and the Council to continue to provide them with political and technical support, while stepping up the involvement of local and regional authorities in the accession process.

Similarly, it invites the authorities of the three countries to unambiguously demonstrate their political determination to realise the European aspirations of their people by making significant progress on substantial reforms to effectively fulfil the criteria for EU membership as soon as possible. Focus is in particular on the independence of the judiciary, the fight against corruption, democratic oversight, human rights and “de-oligarchisation”.

Finally, it is stressed that the facilitation of these countries’ transitions from the Eastern Partnership to the enlargement framework would require the switchover from the NDICI – Global Europe instrument to the Instrument for Pre-accession Assistance (IPA). However, such a transition should be accompanied by a sufficient increase in the overall budget of IPA III in order to retain funding for current IPA III beneficiaries.

Bringing Europe closer to its citizens 

EU Cohesion Policy - News

How ITI and CLLD strengthen local democracy, multi-level governance, and place-based development in EU cohesion policy 


The European Union’s Cohesion Policy is one of its most important instruments for promoting economic, social, and territorial cohesion across its member states. With nearly €392 billion allocated for 2021–2027, it tackles inequalities between regions while supporting a greener, more competitive, and more inclusive Europe. Central to this effort are Integrated Territorial Investments (ITI) and Community-Led Local Development (CLLD), two tools designed to put territorial needs and local actors at the heart of EU funding. 

Why integrated tools matter 

The foundations for a place-based approach were laid in the 2009 Barca Report, which argued that EU policy should focus on unlocking the potential of specific territories while addressing persistent exclusion. ITI and CLLD, introduced in 2014, operationalise this vision by giving local and regional governments a stronger role in programming, governance, and project implementation. 

These tools provide flexibility, enable cooperation across levels of government, and ensure that EU funds target the real needs of communities. For municipalities, regions, and their associations, they are among the most valued features of cohesion policy. 

ITI: Integrating strategies across territories 

ITI allows funding from several EU programmes to be combined in support of integrated strategies. It has been especially used for urban development, where at least 8% of ERDF funding is earmarked for sustainable urban projects. While designed to cover any functional area, urban, rural, or mixed, ITI is most common in metropolitan settings, where challenges like mobility, housing, and regeneration demand integrated solutions. 

CLLD: Communities leading the way 

CLLD builds on the LEADER approach to rural development, empowering local action groups of citizens, NGOs, and businesses to design and implement strategies. While most common in rural areas, it has the potential to strengthen participation and ownership in cities, too. CLLD fosters trust, encourages bottom-up innovation, and helps address the needs of vulnerable groups such as youth, migrants, or elderly people. 

What worked well 

CEMR’s analysis highlights several clear benefits: 

  • Flexibility and relevance – ITI and CLLD adapt EU funding to local needs. 
  • Capacity-building – local authorities gain expertise in managing EU programmes. 
  • Stronger governance – fostering trust and cooperation between local, regional, and national levels. 
  • Visibility of EU action – projects close to citizens showcase the value of EU funds. 
  • Community cohesion – encouraging cooperation among local actors and building metropolitan or regional identity. 

Persistent challenges 

Despite their value, integrated tools face obstacles: 

  • Administrative burden remains high, with complex procedures and slow fund absorption. 
  • Limited flexibility – strategies must still align with national operational programmes, sometimes restricting genuine local priorities. 
  • Time pressures – integrated projects require trust and participation, often at odds with the EU’s strict N+3 spending rule. 
  • Uneven use of PO5 (“Europe closer to citizens”) – some member states underfund this priority despite its direct link to ITI and CLLD. 
  • Urban uptake of CLLD – adapting the rural-focused model to cities remains difficult. 

CEMR recommendations 

Looking ahead, municipalities and regions urge the EU to: 

  • Maintain and strengthen integrated tools in cohesion policy. 
  • Simplify procedures at both EU and national levels, avoiding “gold-plating.” 
  • Clarify guidance on multi-funding, project selection, and the use of PO5. 
  • Exempt ITI/CLLD projects from the N+3 rule to allow more time for participatory approaches. 
  • Reintegrate the EAFRD into the Common Provision Regulation to ease multi-fund projects. 
  • Ensure meaningful local involvement in programming, implementation, and evaluation. 

Conclusion 

ITI and CLLD have proven their worth as vehicles for place-based development, democratic participation, and closer cooperation between Europe and its citizens. While challenges remain, strengthening these tools is essential for making the EU’s cohesion policy more visible, more inclusive, and more responsive to local realities. 

Read the study here 

For more information, contact: 

CEMR New Presidency

CEMR New Presidency - News 2022

A new Presidency for European cities and regions


“I am driven by de facto local democracy!” These were the words of the new President of the Council of European Municipalities and Regions, Gunn Marit Helgesen, addressing CEMR’s Policy Committee members holding their constitutive meeting in Paris, on 5 and 6 December 2022.

Ms Helgesen is also Chair of the Norwegian Association of Local and Regional Authorities (KS) and member of Vestfold og Telemark County Council, located in the south-east of the country. She succeeds Stefano Bonaccini, President of our Italian association (AICCRE) and of the Emilia Romagna Region.

Commenting on her appointment, Gunn Marit Helgesen said: “Our network of local and regional authorities acts as a powerful driver to uphold the European values of freedom and democracy founded on local self-government, respect for the principle of subsidiarity and the participation of citizens.”

She continued: “Under my leadership, we will turn every stone to reverse the current trend of backsliding on earlier progress for women in society. We will also continue to influence EU legislation that affects not only its member countries but also EFTA countries, candidate countries and associate member countries”.

A new presidency for CEMR

CEMR’s new Presidency is highly representative of Europe’s geographical and political diversity: 12 men and 10 women hailing from across the continent, east, west, north and south, including mayors, county leaders and regional presidents. Gunn Marit Helgesen will be flanked by two co-Presidents, namely Christoph Schnaudigel, President of the Karlsruhe Landkreis, and Philippe Laurent, Mayor of Sceaux.

The new Presidency and members of the Policy Committee will take forward CEMR’s work for the next three years, notably on gender equality, the green transition and democratic resilience, in particular against the backdrop of the war in Ukraine.

On that score, Anne Hidalgo, Mayor of Paris and CEMR’s Executive President called for increased mobilisation in support of Ukrainian mayors and councillors, to rebuild basic infrastructure and public services.

The Policy Committee also elected CEMR’s spokespersons on various topics, the members of the Financial Management Committee and our internal auditors. It was organised with the support of our French association, the AFCCRE, and hosted by the City of Paris.

The next meeting will take place in Tbilisi, in June 2023.

Have a look at our photos of these two days: here.
Discover CEMR’s new Presidency and spokespersons.

CEMR Statutes

Local leaders - webpage banner

The legal framework guiding CEMR’s mission and governance


The Statutes of the Council of European Municipalities and Regions (CEMR) set out the legal foundation, mission, and governance structure of the organisation. They define how CEMR operates as an international non-profit association based in Brussels and outline its role in representing local and regional governments across Europe.

At the heart of the Statutes is CEMR’s core mission: to protect and strengthen the autonomy of local and regional governments, promote democratic governance, and support their participation in European and international decision-making. Through advocacy, cooperation, and knowledge exchange, CEMR works to ensure that the voice of cities and regions is heard at the European level.

The document also explains how the organisation is structured and governed. The Policy Committee acts as the main decision-making body, setting strategic priorities and approving budgets, while the Executive Bureau oversees the implementation of decisions and the day-to-day direction of the organisation. The President provides political leadership and representation, and the Secretary General manages the daily operations of the Secretariat.

Membership is open primarily to national associations of local and regional governments that share CEMR’s objectives and democratic values, with additional categories for observers and honorary members.

Overall, the Statutes provide the legal and organisational framework that enables CEMR to work collectively with its members to strengthen local democracy and cooperation across Europe.

For more information, contact:

COP 27

Environment - News

Local and Regional Governments at the COP 27


COP27 in Sharm el-Sheikh, Egypt, ended with the cover decision, known as the Sharm el-Sheikh Implementation Plan. We, as part of “The Local Governments and Municipal Authorities (“LGMA”) United Nations constituency, welcome the outcomes of this COP as there are new aspects such as the fund on loss and damage in the text, referring to the concept of climate justice. However, the outcomes leave many questions open, notably regarding national governments’ commitments to maintain the 1.5-degree objective. 

CEMR/PLATFORMA and UCLG were present in Sharm el Sheik during COP27, as were many member associations (from the UK, France, Israel, Malta, Turkey, Germany…). CEMR is part of the LGMA United Nations constituency, whose focal point is ICLEI. More than 500+ delegates represented cities, regions and other subnational governments at COP27, more than most countries. Over 40000 participants worldwide came to this COP. 

World for Ukraine

Mayors in Ukraine - News 2023

Take part in the ‘World for Ukraine’ on the role of local governance in the recovery of Ukraine after the war


European municipalities are invited to take part in the “Networking Session with Ukrainian Local Communities” that will take place on 7-9 December 2022 in Rzeszów, Poland, in the framework of the World for Ukraine Summit.

33 mayors from all around Ukraine, representing different small- and middle-sized local governance associations, and
different regions of Ukraine – both frontline, de-occupied and rear, will participate in the event and present their communities, share their thoughts on the role of local governance in the recovery of Ukraine after the war.  This includes mayors of Skadovsk, Lviv, Pokrovska, Dunayevetska, Ivankivska, among others.

This is an excellent occasion for mayors from European municipalities to meet their colleagues and launch a new cooperation.

Who is invited to participate

  • Mayor’s and local governance leaders from the EU, who express a wish to find partners in Ukraine;
  • Representatives of international organizations and projects working with local governance in Ukraine and who promote municipal partnerships as an instrument of Ukraine’s recovery.

Practical information

For more information about the programme, please see this document.

If you are interested, please contact info@unitedforua.org for more details on which costs for participation can be covered by the United for Ukraine initiative.