Skip to main content

EU budget campaign – The Netherlands

EU budget campaign 2026

The advocacy work of our national associations: the case of the Netherlands


As negotiations on the next long-term EU budget move forward on two fronts—both between the EU institutions and within each member state among national governments, stakeholders, and regional and local networks—CEMR is sending a clear message: Europe works best when towns, cities, and regions have a real seat at the table.

In this video message, Arjen Gerritsen, King’s Commissioner of Flevoland and CEMR spokesperson on the EU budget, highlights why the stakes are high — not just for local governments, but for every European community.

Town, cities and regions are where EU policies become real. This is where roads are built, where homes are planned, where climate protection happens, where small businesses get support, and where essential public services are delivered every single day. Europe’s ambitions only work when they work locally.

The most crucial discussions are now taking place within the Council and the European Parliament. This is why conversations in the capitals of the different member states are more relevant than ever. CEMR is mobilising its full strength to advocate at the national and regional levels, drawing on the influence of our national associations in the member states.

In this video, Arjen Gerritsen stresses that organisations like the Association of Provinces of the Netherlands (IPO) are already working to ensure regional voices are heard at the national level. But this effort needs to be shared across Europe, and he invites every local and regional politicians to do the same: “Talk to your governments. Raise your voice. Defend multilevel governance.”

Our views on the current EU budget proposal

The current proposal for the next Multiannual Financial Framework (MFF) risks shifting decisions further away from local and regional governments. And when choices are made too far from the ground, investments become less effective — and citizens feel the gap.

That’s why CEMR’s message is clear: partnership should not be optional — it must be the standard.

For months, CEMR has been calling for:

  • A strong role for local and regional governments in EU programmes and funds
  • Clear guarantees for multilevel governance and partnership
  • Greater flexibility so local governments can respond quickly to crises
  • A budget that matches today’s real challenges, from climate adaptation to housing, digital services and territorial cohesion

CEMR’s EU budget campaign centres on one simple truth: When local and regional governments are involved from the start, Europe delivers better results for its citizens.

This is how democracy works — through cooperation, partnership and decisions made close to the people they affect.

Join us in defending that principle.

Learn more about the CEMR EU budget campaign

For more information, contact:

Global Europe 2028–2034

Global Europe - position paper

Local and regional governments at the heart of “Global Europe 2028–2034”: our Policy position


As the European Union prepares its next Multiannual Financial Framework (MFF) for 2028–2034, the Global Europe instrument will define the EU’s external action for the years ahead — encompassing development cooperation, humanitarian aid, enlargement support and Global Gateway. Discover PLATFORMA detailed policy position outlining how this strategic instrument should be shaped to foster sustainable global partnerships and advance inclusive governance.

At a time marked by intersecting global crises — from climate breakdown and shrinking development funds to geopolitical instability — the role of local and regional governments (LRGs) is more critical than ever. PLATFORMA’s paper is thus anchored in the belief that effective global action starts from the ground up.

Local and regional governments as co-decision-makers, implementers and partners

PLATFORMA’s position starts from a stark reality: despite their proximity to citizens and deep knowledge of local contexts, LRGs remain under-recognised in EU external action frameworks. The coalition calls for the Global Europe instrument to move beyond symbolic references to “local authorities” and embed mechanisms that genuinely empower LRGs as co-decision-makers, implementers and partners in EU external policies.

Key recommendations

The Policy Paper makes 9 key recommendations to EU decision makers:

  1. Strengthen multilevel governance in Global Europe and place local and regional governments in the driving seat of territorial development
  2. Pair flexibility and simplification with ambitious official development assistance targets, and enhance accountability and transparency mechanisms
  3. Unlock Global Gateway’s potential through the involvement of local and regional governments
  4. Foster EU delegations’ engagement with local and regional governments
  5. Recognise and empower local and regional governments as unique and effective development partners in fragile contexts
  6. Advance the localisation of the Sustainable Development Goals to achieve decarbonised societies and climate justice
  7. Involve citizens through Global Citizenship Education as a key component of decentralised development cooperation
  8. Foster inclusive and participatory local governance: empower youth, women, and disadvantaged and underrepresented groups
  9. Strengthen local governance through the EU Eastern neighbourhood and enlargement strategy

Through these recommendations, PLATFORMA aims to improve the current proposal for the Global Europe instrument, so that it fully recognises, acknowledges, and supports the contribution of local and regional governments to EU external action, notably through decentralised cooperation as a development aid modality.

PLATFORMA also calls on the European Commission to issue an updated Communication on the structured involvement of local and regional governments and their associations in the new (geo)strategic approach to EU external action.

Read the full Policy position

For more information, contact:

Amendements to the EU budget

Shaping the future of EU Cohesion Policy: CEMR’s amendments to the proposed National and Regional Partnership Plans


The EU’s place-based approach to policymaking — which recognises territorial diversity and builds on the role of local and regional governments — is under critical pressure. The European Commission’s proposal for the next Multiannual Financial Framework risks weakening this approach by centralising investment decisions and blurring the distinct objectives of EU policies with very different territorial logics.

CEMR has therefore developed targeted amendment proposals to the regulation establishing the National and Regional Partnership Plans. These proposals aim to preserve place-based policymaking across EU investments, strengthen democratic and territorial governance, and ensure that policies designed in Brussels and capitals continue to deliver concrete, long-term benefits in cities, towns and regions. 

The main messages driving CEMR amendments

1. Safeguarding cohesion as a core EU priority
CEMR calls for a stronger budgetary commitment to economic, social and territorial cohesion. Reducing the relative weight of cohesion policy — while expanding access to funds to all private actors — risks undermining public services, increasing competition for limited resources, and weakening Europe’s capacity to deliver resilient territories and communities. 

2. Putting territories and people back at the centre
Cohesion policy must work across all regions and respond to territorial diversity. Our amendments reinforce the territorial dimension of EU investments, ensuring that no region or community is left behind and that the objectives of the EU Treaties are fully respected. 

3. Making partnership and multilevel governance real
While the Commission proposal refers to partnership and multilevel governance, it lacks strong guarantees. CEMR proposes clear obligations, monitoring mechanisms and consequences to ensure that local and regional governments are genuinely involved in the design, implementation and monitoring of national plans — not merely consulted in name. 

4. Preventing over-centralisation of EU investments 
Recent experiences with the Recovery and Resilience Facility and other national plans have shown the risks of centralised approaches. CEMR therefore calls for mandatory regional and territorial chapters in national plans, ensuring place-based strategies and meaningful involvement of subnational governments throughout the programming period. 

5. Strengthening integrated territorial development 
Integrated territorial approaches — in urban and non-urban areas — bring Europe closer to citizens and have proven their value on the ground. CEMR proposes a minimum 30% earmarking of national allocations for integrated territorial development, supported by higher EU co-financing and increased pre-financing to enable local authorities to participate fully. 

6. Supporting rural areas, cities and functional territories 
Our amendments reinforce support for rural development, sustainable urban development, urban-rural linkages and functional areas. These approaches are essential to tackling demographic change, climate challenges and social inequalities in a coherent and coordinated way. 

A call for a stronger, fairer cohesion policy

CEMR’s amendment proposals are guided by a clear conviction: Europe’s resilience, prosperity and democratic strength depend on strong local and regional governments and on cohesion policy that is ambitious, inclusive and place-based

We call on the European Parliament and Member States to take these proposals seriously and ensure that the future EU cohesion policy delivers for all territories and all citizens. 

👇 We invite you to consult the full set of CEMR amendment proposals for a detailed overview of our recommendations and legal changes to the Commission’s proposal.

More information:

MFF 2028-2034 position paper

EU Budget - News 2025

A stronger Europe is built locally: CEMR publishes its position paper on the EU Budget 2028–2034


As the EU prepares its next long-term budget, the Multiannual Financial Framework (MFF) 2028–2034, CEMR calls for a clear message to EU institutions and Member States: Europe’s future strength depends on empowering its towns, cities and regions.

CEMR’s new position paper, A stronger Europe is built locally, sets out how the next EU budget can effectively support territorial cohesion, competitiveness, democracy, and resilience. In the paper, CEMR warns that while the Commission’s proposal slightly increases overall resources, it reorients priorities toward defence, security, and industrial competitiveness—often at the expense of cohesion and local development, the very pillars that bring the EU closest to its citizens.

Multilevel governance must be non-negotiable

The paper highlights a major risk of recentralisation: by granting Member States and the European Commission broader discretion in defining funding priorities, the proposal could marginalise local governments, particularly in countries with weaker multilevel governance structures.

CEMR urges the EU to reinforce partnership mechanisms across all programmes—especially within the National and Regional Partnership Plans (NRPP), the European Semester, the European Competitiveness Fund (ECF) and the Global Gateway. Stable, well-resourced local and regional governments platforms are essential to tailor EU investments to realities on the ground.

Cohesion at the heart of Europe’s transformation

CEMR stresses that cohesion is a treaty-based objective and must remain central. The paper calls for:

  • Mandatory regional and territorial chapters in all Partnership Plans
  • Increased budget allocation for the single integrated funding instrument proposed by the EU Commission, “The Fund”
  • A mandatory 30% earmark for sustainable territorial development, including 15% for urban development
  • A safeguarding mechanism to protect local governments’ access to funds when national governments fail to meet conditionalities
  • Strengthening ESF+ (European Social Fund) for cohesion, youth and inclusion

Without these guarantees, Europe’s green, digital, and social transitions risk leaving entire territories behind.

Competitiveness and connectivity must acknowledge territorial reality

While competitiveness is a top EU priority, CEMR notes that the Commission’s budget proposal overlooks the territorial dimension. Cohesion and competitiveness are two sides of the same coin, and local and regional governments’ role in driving local and regional economic development should be recognised.

CEMR paper also calls for biodiversity and nature restoration to become explicit priorities in the European Competitiveness Fund (ECF) and urges simpler access to ECF, Horizon Europe, and the Connecting Europe Facility (CEF)—especially for smaller municipalities. It also stresses the need to include urban mobility as a strategic CEF priority.

Democracy and enlargement: supporting the foundations of Europe

With rising polarisation, disinformation, and harassment of local politicians, the position paper urges the EU to strengthen local democracy, support civic participation, and fund democratic resilience—including Global Citizenship Education and support for local media.

On enlargement, CEMR calls for local and regional governments to play a central role in the accession process of candidate countries, backed by stronger capacity-building and dedicated resources.

Read the full position paper here

For more information, contact:

Our reaction to the Agenda for cities

Twinning Report - News

CEMR welcomes the publication of the EU Agenda for Cities and the renewed recognition of local and regional governments as essential partners in delivering Europe’s priorities


The publication of the Agenda for Cities marks an important step towards strengthening the urban dimension of EU policies. It does acknowledge the key role of local and regional governments in implementing 70% of EU legislation, and the importance therefore to better inform and associate local governments in the preparation of European legislations. But the agenda falls short of answering the “ambition” level announced by President Ursula von der Leyen in her mission letter to Executive Vice President Raffaele Fitto.

Beyond a catalogue of policy areas where cities play an important role, and a list of initiatives already implemented by the European Commission, several elements will require clarification and improvement to ensure the Agenda truly delivers solutions for cities of all sizes and contribute to better policy making by transparent and representatives partnership with local and regional governments at European level. 

The Agenda for cities is just one piece of the puzzle 

While the EU Commission states that the Agenda applies to cities of all sizes, as well as suburbs and towns, the continued reliance on the Eurostat definition of “urban centres” (50,000+ inhabitants) risks leaving much of Europe behind. As we have seen with the implementation of the European Innovative action, the Eurostat definition has become the minimum population criteria in calls for proposals directly managed by the European Commission. This approach may inadvertently exclude small and medium-sized municipalities, which make up the majority of local governments and are at the heart of delivering EU policies.  

But beyond the Agenda for Cities, CEMR regrets that this initiative has not been enshrined in a broader more comprehensive territorial development strategy for Europe. As set out in our position paper Towards an inclusive EU agenda for cities of every size and context, an effective EU Agenda must reflect the full territorial diversity of the EU and avoid reinforcing urban–rural divides.  

A welcome recognition of cities’ role, but structured multilevel governance is still missing 

CEMR welcomes the acknowledgement of local and regional authorities as key implementers of EU legislation. However, the governance model proposed in the Agenda still relies heavily on ad hoc consultations, including the reference to the June 2025 Implementation Dialogue, which lacked transparency and representativity. 

We reiterate the need for a permanent, structured and inclusive multilevel governance mechanism involving local and regional governments and their representative associations at national and European level. This is essential for shaping, not only implementing, EU policies. In this respect, associations representing local and regional governments at European but also national level must be the go-to partners for the European Commission, to ensure representativity and legitimacy of their consultation processes.  

When mentioning the preparation of the “National and Regional Partnership Plan” for the EU budget post 2027, the Commission states that structured multilevel dialogue will be key feature in the preparation and implementation of the plan, but did not include any binding measure to ensure this is the case. CEMR also made concrete recommendations to secure the involvement of local and regional governments in preparation of these plans. 

Better Implementation must become a priority of the EU Agenda 

It is positive that the Agenda includes some specific support under a new “EU Cities platform” for capacity building, innovation and participation in dialogue. It will be important that this support offer is not restricted to few cities but available to all subnational governments.  
CEMR calls in particular for a dedicated Better Implementation pillar as part of the EU Urban Agenda with: 

  • Governance and competence impact assessments for all new EU proposals, 
  • capacity-building resources in the reforms pillar of the next MFF, 
  • regular and inclusive implementation dialogues, 
  • and a one-stop-shop integrating all support tools for subnational governments. 

These elements are indispensable for translating EU ambitions into real local outcomes.  

Funding: more clarity, but uncertainties remain 

We welcome the launch of the new EU City Portal, which can help cities navigate funding opportunities more easily. At the same time, the future EU Facility – to be directly managed by the European Commission raises questions about the future of existing programmes (EUI and URBACT) and on governance, accessibility, and safeguarding participation of smaller municipalities. To unlock the full potential of local governments, the EU must deliver simpler, fairer and better-aligned funding, as outlined in our position paper.  

Promising measures in the agenda, if they remain accessible to all

CEMR welcomes new initiatives announced in the Agenda, including: 

  • “potential” access to the European Competitiveness Fund for clean transition and industrial decarbonisation, as well as for resilience, security and defence 
  • High and technical levels consultations of urban stakeholders 
  • strengthened support for capacity building, including on public procurement, 

While cities are encouraged to adopt the “mission approach” it remains unclear whether that is mere suggestion or whether it will come with a new call and potential funding for these “Mission Cities”. 

These measures can help cities accelerate the green and digital transitions—as long as access is equitable and not restricted to larger or well-resourced municipalities. 

Our final message 

Today’s publication is a milestone for Europe’s urban future. But an EU Agenda for Cities must be inclusive, territorially balanced and grounded in genuine multilevel governance. CEMR stands ready to work with the European Commission, Member States, and its member national associations to ensure that this Agenda becomes a truly transformative framework—one that delivers for cities, towns and regions of every size and context

For more information, contact:

EU budget: Local Alliance action plan

Local Alliance - News Section

Making the next EU budget work for cities and regions: the Local Alliance’s 10-point action plan


The Local Alliance – a coalition of Europe’s leading local and regional governments: ACR+, CEMR, Climate Alliance, Energy Cities, Eurocities, FEDARENE, ICLEI Europe and POLIS, – aims at ensuring that our constituencies have the competencies and resources to implement and reinforce Europe’s resilience, competitiveness and decarbonisation.

We share a common vision for the 2028–2034 Multiannual Financial Framework (MFF) to become a strong, democratic, and future-proof tool that drives cohesion across territories, reinforces Europe’s competitiveness, and enables a just transition towards climate-neutral and resilient transition.

Local and regional governments are Europe’s frontline for delivering change. They are the democratic level closest to citizens, trusted by a majority of Europeans, and directly or through shared responsibility in charge of implementing most EU legislation. They mobilise the bulk of climate-relevant investment, drive innovation and competitiveness, and safeguard cohesion and just transition by ensuring that no community is left behind. Without their leadership, Europe cannot succeed in meeting its green, digital, social, and competitiveness ambitions.

Yet instead of empowering this strength, the Commission’s proposal for the next MFF risks sidelining local and regional governments, who are best placed to deliver. A centralised approach, which does not reflect the local realities and priorities, not only threatens delivery on the ground, but also Europe’s long-term societal, democratic and economic resilience and competitiveness. As the Committee of the Regions’ most recent report highlights, European cities and regions need a budget to help build the Union from the ground up – where local and regional authorities are not only implementers but co-creators of Europe’s future.

With the negotiations already underway, the Local Alliance calls on the European Parliament and the Council of the EU to seize this opportunity to put democracy, territorial cohesion, and competitiveness at the heart of the next MFF by ensuring local and regional governments are recognised as indispensable partners. Europe cannot achieve its strategic objectives without working hand in hand with its towns, cities and regions. For this reason, the Local Alliance presents an 10 point action plan to ensure the EU budget delivers tangible results for people in every territory across Europe and beyond.

For the next MFF, we call on:

1. Stronger multilevel governance mechanisms to deliver both reforms and investments.

2. Stronger partnership principle for the implementation of the MFF.

For the National and Regional Partnership Plans: 

3. Making regional and territorial chapters of the National and Regional Partnership Plans mandatory, with a clear section on cities.

4. Earmarking for a just transition & affordable living for all.

5. A real EU program for cities of all sizes under the proposed EU Facility.

6. Safeguarding mechanism for the local and regional level to guarantee their access to EU funds.

7. Linking performance indicators to EU law implementation and territorial delivery.

For the European Competitiveness Fund and Horizon Europe: 

8. Competitiveness Fund and Horizon Europe should recognise cities and regions explicitly as innovators and investors.

For Horizon Europe:

9. Continuing the Mission approach under Horizon Europe.

For the Global Europe Facility:

10. Stronger support for accession cities and regions for the future of European cohesion.

Read the full position paper here

For more information, contact:

The EU must hear its cities

Cities and regions unite to defend their role in Europe’s next budget


During this year’s European Week of Regions and Cities, Europe’s local and regional leaders sent a clear message: the future of the EU budget must not sideline those who make Europe work.

Through two major events — one under the #CohesionAlliance and another by The European Urban Forum and the Local Alliance — the Council of European Municipalities and Regions (CEMR) and its partners mobilised to defend the role of towns, cities and regions in shaping and delivering the EU’s next long-term budget for the period 2028–2034.

These engagements follow a broader advocacy effort launched right after the European elections, when the new EU institutions began to define the political priorities for the current mandate.

Standing up for partnership and cohesion

On 15 October, elected representatives from across Europe gathered in front of the European Parliament to call on EU institutions to give local and regional governments full partnership rights in the future Cohesion Policy, and to resist its nationalisation and centralisation.

In a symbolic action joined by Members of the European Parliament (MEPs), the European Committee of the Regions and Europe’s territorial associations, the #CohesionAlliance partners adopted a seven-point call rejecting the European Commission’s current proposal .

“Bundling Cohesion Policy with policies on agriculture, defence or migration,” the statement warned, “would force local and regional authorities to compete for funds at the national level.” Such a shift, participants stressed, risks moving decision-making power away from regions and cities — the level where the EU’s goals are actually delivered.

“Competitiveness and cohesion are two sides of the same coin,” said Christoph Schnaudigel, CEMR Co-President and President of the County of Karlsruhe, Germany. “Businesses in our cities need infrastructure, housing, schools, and fibre networks. Cohesion is part of the Treaties — we need competitiveness and cohesion together. Otherwise, the money will disappear before reaching local communities. The European Commission must talk to us. You can’t know what territories need from Brussels or Berlin — we know it at the local level.”, he added.

Cities at the centre of Europe’s priorities

Later the same day, local leaders gathered again in the European Parliament for a debate titled Shaping the Next EU Budget with Cities, convened by the European Urban Forum in cooperation with the Local Alliance.

The message from city leaders, MEPs and European institutions was united: Europe’s priorities — from the green transition to digital transformation — cannot succeed without empowering cities and regions. As CEMR’s Christoph Schnaudigel put it: “You don’t know what the needs are from Brussels. We do — from the local level.”

Pascal Smet, Member of the Brussels-Capital Parliament and the European Committee of the Regions, warned that the proposed setup risks creating “a Europe of nation states”.

Other leaders, such as Peter Dermol, Mayor of Velenja (Slovenia), underlined the dangers of losing citizens’ trust if Europe fails to deliver on its promises in regions undergoing industrial transitions.

From Germany, Eckart Würzner, Mayor of Heidelberg, stressed that “cities are defenders of democracy” and that without adequate resources, “we will stand up” to protect the local dimension of Europe’s future.

Anna Lisa Boni, Deputy Mayor of Bologna (Italy), urged the EU to use the forthcoming Agenda for Cities as “a lighthouse” to ensure the next Multiannual Financial Framework (MFF) strengthens, rather than weakens, the role of local governments.

CEMR’s key asks on the next EU budget

CEMR is already working on an intense advocacy campaign to shape the current EU budget proposal made by the European Commission.

As stated in the document, ‘EU budget 2028-2034: Main changes, challenges and opportunities for local and regional governments’, CEMR has key asks on this topic:

  • Ensuring effective multilevel governance and meaningful partnership in the next MFF
  • Placing cohesion and territorial balance at the core of the next eu budget
  • Guaranteeing fair access to EU funding for local governments across all EU programmes 
  • Enhancing support for local governments in EU enlargement and accession of candidate countries
  • Developing a dedicated EU programme to reinforce local democracy

These proposals echo the sentiment voiced by local leaders throughout the European Week: Europe’s strength lies in its territories. Cohesion and competitiveness can only coexist through real partnership between all levels of government.

For more information, contact:

What the EU budget proposal means locally

Analysis of the EU budget proposal of the European Commission: time to raise the voice of local and regional governments


On 16 July, the European Commission unveiled its proposals for the next EU long term budget: the Multiannual Financial Framework (MFF) for 2028-2034. This proposal represents a significant shift in the EU’s approach and governance to its long-term budget. While the Commission is proposing an overall budget increase compared to the current period, investment priorities are being substantially reshaped.

There is a marked shift towards funding for defence and security, as well as for competitiveness and support for European businesses and industries. However, this change comes at the expense of traditional EU policies such as Cohesion Policy and the Common Agricultural Policy (CAP), which have long provided relevant funding to local and regional governments for structural investments in their communities.

In this context, the coming months will be crucial. CEMR and its members will engage with decision makers in the European Council and the European Parliament to ensure that local and regional governments are not sidelined in the negotiations.

These are the key areas for which CEMR will be advocating in the coming months:

1. Multi-level governance and funding for Cohesion Policy

The Commission proposes a major restructuring of all shared management funds, including Cohesion Policy, CAP, Common Fisheries Policy, and funding instruments for internal security, border management, asylum and migration. All these funds would now be brought together under comprehensive ‘National and Regional Partnership Plans’.

The proposed MFF represents a major turning point for the role of cities and regions in delivering economic, social, and territorial cohesion. While Member States may still choose to collaborate with local and regional governments as Managing Authorities – as currently practised under Cohesion Policy – the new framework grants them broader discretion in setting investment priorities. This increased flexibility, however, comes with a clear risk: a shift toward greater centralisation of funding decisions at both the European and national levels. Such a trend could weaken the place-based approach and marginalise the very actors – our cities and regions – who are best positioned to respond to local needs and deliver tangible results on the ground.

Another major concern is the reduced financial weight given the cohesion objectives. The proposed national and regional funding now merge resources from cohesion policy funds, CAP, fisheries, and other programme objectives (e.g. LIFE, Social Climate Fund), diluting the funding explicitly dedicated to economic, social, and territorial cohesion. CEMR estimates that Cohesion Policy could shrink to just 20% of the total EU budget, compared to nearly one-third in the current MFF. In addition, repayment of Next Generation EU has been integrated in the MFF first heading together with the national and regional partnership plans, which could raise an issue of additional decrease in this budget in case of increased interest rates.

2. Acknowledging the role of local and regional governments in competitiveness

The main spending priority in the European Commission proposal is competitiveness, with a focus on the new European Competitiveness Fund, a strengthened Horizon Europe programme, and flagship EU initiatives such as Erasmus +.

Local and regional governments are crucial drivers of economic and social ecosystems at the local level, leading innovation and fostering local economic development. Many municipalities and regions have already benefited from the Horizon programme. It will therefore be essential to clearly identify local and regional governments as key beneficiaries in order to achieve the dual objective of cohesive competitiveness.

Likewise, the increased focus on defence and security must be matched by a recognition of the role local and regional authorities play in securing resilient infrastructure and essential public services, including civil protection and crisis preparedness. This role must be reflected in both national and regional budget allocations, as well as in EU direct fundings.

3. Consistent approach in the role of local and regional in the Global Europe pillar

CEMR and PLATFORMA welcome the attention given to local governments in the proposed Global Europe regulation, particularly their inclusion in consultation, engagement, and capacity-strengthening in line with their respective mandate, as well as the support foreseen for local authority networks and alliances in Europe and partner countries.

However, this recognition is not applied consistently across all geographic pillars. It is notably absent for candidate and potential candidate countries, including Ukraine, and for the neighbourhood countries East and South. Furthermore, the regulation  overlooks the potential of decentralised (city-to-city and region-to-region) cooperation as a proven modality to empower local authorities in partner countries, provide local public services for the populations, localise the Sustainable Development Goals of the 2030  Agenda, and create an enabling environment for Global Gateway investments and for civil society organisations.

As inter-institutional negotiations begin, CEMR will actively engage with EU institutions, building on existing coalitions such as the Local Alliance and the Cohesion Alliance to amplify the messages of united local and regional governments in Europe.

Note: This is an initial analysis of the proposal presented by the European Commission. CEMR will provide its members with a more in-depth assessment in the coming weeks, once all the regulations have been thoroughly reviewed.

Local Alliance reacts to EU budget proposal

EU Budget proposals risk cutting out cities and regions


The Local Alliance – a coalition of eight leading networks of local and regional governments – is raising the alarm over the European Commission’s proposal for the next EU budget, warning it could sideline cities and regions and undermine the delivery of key EU priorities.

The Commission’s proposal for the 2028-2034 Multiannual Financial Framework,  presented on 16 July, introduces new ‘National and Regional Partnership Plans’, intended to simplify EU funding and reduce disparities. However, the Local Alliance argues that this approach risks centralising the EU budget, weakening Cohesion Policy, and marginalising local and regional governments in the policy design and implementation. 

Without a clear earmarking of Cohesion Funds for all territories, including cities, and robust multilevel governance, local and regional authorities are unlikely to access the tools they need to implement EU priorities on the ground. Building on the Court of Auditors’ warnings of the limited impact and quality of projects funded through Recovery Funds, the Local Alliance fears that this new structure of National- Regional Plans might not be able to respond to the real transition and cohesion needs of communities. 

The proposal also fails to clarify how cities and regions would be affected if national governments fall short on reform commitments or breach horizontal conditions such as the Rule of Law. This could jeopardise progress on critical local goals, from clean transport and affordable housing to inclusive communities, the creation of jobs and quality public services, while weakening democratic governance and the principle of multilevel democracy.

The Alliance welcomes the proposed European Competitiveness Fund and the FP10 Framework Programme for Research and Innovation, recognising their potential to address productivity and innovation gaps across regions. However, both instruments must ensure meaningful involvement of cities and regions in priority setting and delivery, as competitiveness and cohesion are two sides of the same coin, as highlighted in the Letta Report. 

As the budget negotiations move forward, the Local Alliance calls on the European Parliament and the European Council to seize this crucial opportunity to strengthen the role of cities and regions, safeguard cohesion policy, and ensure the EU budget delivers tangible results for people across Europe.

Ahead of the EU budget negotiations, local leaders call for: 

  • Reforms and investments are to be defined through a multilevel governance approach. Safeguards must be included in the National and Regional Partnerships Plans to ensure mandatory cooperation with local governments in the design and implementation of the plan.
  • The territorial chapter of these plans must be clearly stated as an obligation and not as an option left to the discretion of central governments.
  • Clear and enforceable safeguarding mechanisms to ensure that local and regional authorities can directly access EU funds, especially in cases where national governments delay or restrict disbursements.
  • Concrete institutionalised cooperation with cities and regions in the European Competitiveness Fund (ECF) and FP10, and we urge the EU institutions to involve local and regional governments as partners in setting priorities and strengthening place-based innovation.

 Notes to editors:

The Local Alliance represents the eight leading networks of European local and regional governments, ACR+, CEMR, Climate Alliance, Energy Cities, Eurocities, FEDARENE, ICLEI Europe and POLIS working together to ensure the next EU budget 2028- 2034 delivers for people by empowering local and regional governments in delivering the transition on the ground.

Christoph Schnaudigel, Co-President of CEMR; Vice-President of the German Section of CEMR (RGRE); President of the County of Karlsruhe, German County Association, said: 

“After analysing the European Commission’s proposal for the EU budget, it is clear that local and regional governments across Europe must mobilise. The proposal fails to uphold economic, social, and territorial cohesion as a core objective. As a result, the share of the budget allocated to Cohesion Policy — including social and territorial development — has been reduced, with real consequences for the quality of life across Europe. Furthermore, centralising decision-making towards member states will not help address the realities and challenges of the territories, making EU funding less efficient. We must act decisively in the coming months to reverse this and defend a strong, inclusive Cohesion Policy, as well as the respect of multilevel governance”.

For more information, contact:

What do we want from the EU budget

EU budget - Op-Ed news

Don’t repeat Recovery and Resilience Facility mistakes: local governments must shape EU’s long-term budget


As the European Commission prepares to unveil its proposal for the post-2027 Multiannual Financial Framework today, Wednesday (16 July), attention is turning to how the EU will shape its long-term investment strategy.

What is at stake is not just the amount of funding, but how and with whom those resources will be planned and implemented.

At the EU annual budget conference in May, EU Commission President Ursula von der Leyen made a shift in tone.

For the first time, she spoke not only of “national” plans, but of “national and regional partnerships for investments and reforms.”

This is more than a semantic change, but words must be followed by action. Without concrete steps, even the most inclusive language risks remaining just words.

The new proposed investment architecture is set to build on lessons from the Recovery and Resilience Facility (RRF). But unless a key flaw of the RRF is addressed — namely, the lack of involvement of local actors — the same mistakes will be repeated.

If we want these partnerships to succeed, they must be co-created with the local and regional governments that will implement them. From green mobility to housing and digital infrastructure, success also depends on getting the governance right.

Luckily, we do not need to start from scratch. The word “partnership” recalls an existing model: the Partnership Agreements used in the Cohesion Policy. These already require member states to involve local and regional governments in shaping investment strategies.

In countries like Poland and Portugal, it has led to investments aligned with real local needs—revitalising industrial areas, developing green transport—showing that when local actors are at the table, EU funding delivers real impact.

But this is about more than funding. As the EU aims to pair investments with reform, multilevel governance must become a central principle of the reform agenda itself. We are therefore calling for:

1. A co-creation approach that underpins new investment and reform partnerships, with transparent and structured mechanisms to involve local and regional governments in shaping priorities, both at the national level and within EU processes such as the European Semester.

2. Multi-level governance must be embedded in the reform dimension of these partnerships, ensuring that Member States not only consult but also empower local and regional governments to act as both planners and implementers.

3. A funding model that respects the principle of subsidiarity, with flexible, bottom-up approaches and less stringent thematic concentration decided at the Commission level to avoid the repetition of the challenges recalled in the mid-term revision of the RRF.

The EU stands at a turning point. The next long-term budget is a chance to move towards a more democratic, grounded, and effective policymaking, or to repeat the mistakes of the past. Let’s not miss this chance. Let’s make partnership the rule, not the exception.

Signatories: 

  • Christopher Schnaudigel is co-president of the Council of European Municipalities and Regions (CEMR), vice-president of the German Section of CEMR (RGRE), and president of the county of Karlsruhe (German County Association)
  • Ľubica Karvašová is an MEP, vice-chair of the Committee on Regional Development, Renew Europe coordinator in REGI Committee
  • Vladimir Prebilič is an MEP, rapporteur on Simplification of the Cohesion Policy, Greens/EFA Coordinator in the REGI Committee.

*****

This opinion article was published on EU Observer on 15 July 2025. You can read it here

For more information, contact: