Skip to main content

BoT Ambassadors 2026

Bridges of Trust Award Ceremony 2026 - Ambassador Award

Bridges of Trust Award: The recognition of European municipal cooperation with Ukraine

964 words
4–6 minutes

There is a form of diplomacy that rarely makes headlines yet can have a profound impact on people’s lives: two mayors meet and agree to start a cooperation. What follows is a continuing conversation about what is needed and a mutual exchange of expertise involving stakeholders from administration, civil society, and citizens. 

On 14 October 2026, in Brussels, during the European Week of Regions and Cities, that quiet work got formal recognition. At the first edition of the Bridges of Trust Award Ceremony, six municipal partnerships were named the Bridges of Trust Ambassadors, a new award for municipal cooperation between Ukraine and the rest of Europe, some dating back decades, others born in the first weeks after the full-scale invasion.

Bridges of Trust Award Ceremony 2026
Bridges of Trust Award Ceremony 2026 – CEMR President Christoph Schnaudigel

Awardees reflecting diversity 

Municipal twinning has existed in Europe since the aftermath of the Second World War, when former adversaries paired their towns as a small, deliberate act of reconciliation. That habit never really went away, but it found a new purpose. Oberhausen (Germany) and Zaporizhzhia (Ukraine), for instance, have been twinned since 1986; the partnership marked its 40th anniversary this year, and rather than fading into ceremony, it took on a very practical role. Together, the Bridges of Trust Ambassadors reflect the diversity of municipal cooperation, in terms of the size and location of the municipalities, the stakeholders involved and the topics addressed, and rehabilitation equipment delivered to Zaporizhzhia’s City Hospital No. 4, a Social Taxi service that gave over 1,200 rides in its first six months, and more than ten community vehicles sent through a civil protection programme. 

Bridges of Trust Award Ceremy 2026 - Artem Husak
Bridges of Trust Award Ceremony 2026 – Artem Husak

What distinguishes the awarded partnerships is that the relationship is dynamic and mutually beneficial. Fastiv, in Kyiv Oblast, partnered with Trollhättan in Sweden only in 2024, and within a year, Fastiv’s own crisis-management specialists were training Trollhättan’s emergency services, drawing on experience no peacetime municipality would otherwise have.

Bridges of Trust Award Ceremony 2026 - Vladimir Prebilic
Bridges of Trust Award Ceremony 2026 – Vladimir Prebilic

The partnerships behind the Award 

The award is a joint initiative of the Bridges of Trust Community, coordinated by the European Partnership Hub Secretariat, hosted by CEMR, and supported by the EU and its member states through the U-LEAD with Europe Programme. In total, 55 municipal partnerships with Ukraine handed in joint applications, showing their high-quality cooperation. Nine partner organisations across Europe pre-selected candidate partnerships. A jury including the European Committee of the Regions selected a cohort of them. The final say went to the four All-Ukrainian national associations — the people best placed to judge which partnerships actually made a difference on the ground. 

Bridges of Trust Award Ceremony 2026 - Olena Tomniuk
Bridges of Trust Award Ceremony 2026 – Olena Tomniuk

Six Ambassadors were named, plus one special recognition. 

The seven partnerships 


Ropaži (Latvia) × Boiarka (Ukraine) — established February 2023 

Began with emergency aid (vehicles, generators) in the weeks after the invasion. Today it funds a Social Wardrobe and domestic-violence shelter supporting over 3,000 people a month, alongside recreation programmes that have brought more than 100 children from Boiarka to Latvia. 

Trollhättan (Sweden) × Fastiv (Ukraine) — established 2024 

A Memorandum of Cooperation signed within six months of first contact, built around crisis-management training, civil preparedness and youth exchange, including annual summer camps for children. 

Bourges (France) × Korosten (Ukraine) — established 9 March 2022 

One of the fastest municipal responses on record: first contact on 2 March 2022, a signed agreement a week later, 200 women and children hosted in Bourges within three weeks. The relationship never scaled back — regular delegation visits, and €10,000 in emergency aid sent after a drone attack on Korosten in April 2026. 

Ciortești (Romania) × Zarichchia (Ukraine) — established 2025 

Two small rural municipalities, both led by women mayors, with limited resources but a fast-moving relationship — a five-day study visit and a series of working sessions produced a Letter of Intent for formal twinning within about a year. 

Oberhausen (Germany) × Zaporizhzhia (Ukraine) — twinned since 1986 

The longest-standing partnership in the group, and a case study in what four decades of trust can do when circumstances demand it — described above. 

Coevorden (Netherlands) & Nordhorn (Germany) × Chuhuiv (Ukraine) — twinning since 1963, trilateral since 2023 

This is the one to watch. Trilateral municipal partnerships — where two established European twin cities jointly bring in a Ukrainian partner — are still rare but increasingly used as a way to share resources and coordination across borders. Coevorden and Nordhorn have been twinned since 1963; rather than each starting a separate relationship with Ukraine, they opened their existing partnership to include Chuhuiv, combining youth exchanges, a solidarity concert that funded equipment, and the 2026 donation of a specialised civil protection vehicle. 

Utrecht (Netherlands) × Mariupol (Ukraine) — Special Recognition 

Mariupol has been under Russian occupation since 2022, which sets this partnership apart from the other six: there is no functioning municipality on the Ukrainian side to twin with in the usual sense. Utrecht instead built a relationship with Mariupol’s exiled administration — creating two permanent staff positions in 2022 for former Mariupol municipal employees, co-developing the Mariupol Revival Plan, a reconstruction and recovery vision for the city’s eventual return, and in 2025 launching the Mariupol Justice Project with the International Criminal Court to document testimonies. It receives a separate recognition precisely because it operates under conditions none of the others faces — planning for a city’s future while that city remains inaccessible. 

Bridges of Trust Ambassadors Awards
Bridges of Trust Ambassadors Awards

What happens next  

Bridges of Trust Award Ceremony 2026 - Ambassador Award

Each Ambassador enters a one-year Acceleration Programme: strategic support, peer learning, professional storytelling and visibility at high-level European events.

The aim is not only to mark these seven partnerships, but to give other towns and cities — including pairs already twinned for decades — a real example of what the relationship can become.  

Because the most durable form of European integration may not be the kind negotiated in Brussels. It’s the kind built between two, or sometimes three, town halls that decided the relationship was worth keeping. 

For more information, contact:

Statement on the arrest of Vahap Seçer 

Mersin Metropolitan Turkiye

CEMR denounces the arrest of Vahap Seçer, President of the Union of Municipalities of Türkiye and CEMR Vice-President 

406 words
2–3 minutes

The Council of European Municipalities and Regions (CEMR) is deeply concerned about the arrest of Vahap Seçer on 6 October 2026, Mayor of Mersin Metropolitan Municipality, President of the Union of Municipalities of Türkiye (UMT), and CEMR Vice-President. 

Mayor Seçer is the third President of UMT, CEMR’s member association in Türkiye, to be deprived of his liberty since the 2024 Turkish local elections. His arrest follows those of Ekrem İmamoğlu, Mayor of Istanbul Metropolitan Municipality, on 19 March 2025, and Zeydan Karalar, Mayor of Adana Metropolitan Municipality, on 8 July 2025. 

These developments are part of a broader and deeply concerning trend. Since the 2024 local elections, more than 80 municipalities in Türkiye have had their mayors replaced, and over 30 mayors have been arrested. Among them is Sinem Dedetaş, Mayor of Üsküdar and a member of the CEMR Policy Committee, who was arrested in July 2026. Taken together, these events point to a continued erosion of local democracy in Türkiye, a trend CEMR has repeatedly raised concerns about. 

CEMR reiterates that local elected representatives must be able to carry out their duties freely and without undue interference and calls on the Turkish authorities to: 

  • Respect the democratic mandates entrusted to local elected representatives by citizens and uphold the principles of the European Charter of Local Self-Government; 
  • Release arrested elected representatives and allow them to resume their mandates; 
  • Ensure that UMT can operate freely and continue to be led by the representatives chosen by its members. 

CEMR also calls on European institutions and the wider international community to stand in solidarity with democratically elected local representatives in Türkiye and to raise these cases in their dialogue with the Turkish authorities. 

At a time when democracy is facing increasing pressure across Europe, protecting local self-government is more important than ever. CEMR will continue to follow developments closely and stands firmly alongside UMT and its members and partners in Türkiye. 

Related content:

For more information, contact:

The post-2030 Scenarios

Beyond 2030: How can territories help shape the future of sustainable development? 

1,174 words
5–7 minutes

On 5 October, CEMR and PLATFORMA brought together almost 100 participants from over 50 countries for a public webinar on the future of the global sustainable development framework beyond 2030. The discussion gathered voices from research, civil society, women’s organisations and local government to answer one question: how can territories really be at the heart of the post-2030 framework? 

Eleven years after the adoption of the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs), many targets remain off track. The webinar, which followed CEMR spokespersons’ debate in June, examined lessons from SDG implementation and emerging challenges, from climate risks to technological disruption and geopolitical tensions, that will shape the next agenda. 

Opening the meeting, Fabrizio Rossi, CEMR Secretary General, stressed that the SDGs remain the world’s most important shared political framework, but that implementation will only succeed if it is localised. Local and regional governments are not merely implementers of global agendas: they are political actors that turn commitments into services, investments and policies, and must be recognised as strategic partners and co-architects of the next agenda. He also called for better local data to anticipate risks, and for gender equality to move from commitment to leadership. 

“The SDGs remain the world’s most important shared political framework, but implementation will only succeed if it is localised.

The local and regional governments should be part of the discussions; they should be at the table, not solely the implementers.” – Fabrizio Rossi 

Four possible scenarios after 2030 

Axel Berger, Deputy Director of the German Institute of Development and Sustainability (IDOS), opened the discussion with a keynote on a global sustainability agenda beyond 2030. He recalled that the SDGs have delivered real progress: 92% of the world’s population now has access to electricity, 74% of people were online in 2025 (up from 40% in 2015), and 134 countries have already met the target on under-5 child mortality.  

Yet an implementation gap remains, driven by successive shocks and conflicts, a financing gap of around $4 trillion a year in developing countries, a weak implementation architecture, and eroding political ownership and trust. 

“The debate should move from the number of goals to purpose and delivery, with resilience, new alliances and a role for subnational actors.”

Berger stressed that negotiations on a successor agenda will take place in a harder context than in 2015, marked by multipolarity, low trust and overlapping crises, which makes an inclusive and trust-building process even more important.

“At the moment, we are putting an emphasis on issues like competitiveness and security, and the SDGs in the Agenda 2030 falls to the wayside.”   

Berger presented four possible paths: continuing the SDGs, extending them with new goals, reducing the number of goals, or building a new vision focused on delivery, resilience and new alliances, including the role of subnational actors. With the SDG Summit in September 2027 meant to launch the process, he called for negotiations that are inclusive, transparent, science-based and learning-oriented. 

“Beyond pushing forward on SDG implementation, what we urgently need to do between now and September 2027 – and well beyond – is to build progressive alliances with like-minded nations and stakeholders.” – Axel Berger 


Perspectives from civil society, research and women’s organisations 

Jyotsna Mohan Singh, Advocacy Officer at Forus International, a network representing more than 24,000 civil society organisations, argued that putting territories at the heart means shifting power, resources and decision-making closer to people, not only localising implementation. She underlined the complementary roles of local governments, civil society and communities, including civil society’s independent accountability role, and presented Voluntary Local Reviews as a way to connect local evidence to budgets, national reviews and global accountability. 

“Putting territories at the heart of the post-2030 framework should not mean simply asking territories to do more. It should mean giving territories, and the people within them, a greater voice, greater resources and greater influence over the decisions that affect their lives.”  

“Local governments are not simply the last mile of implementation. They are important governance actors, with knowledge of what works, what does not work, and what people actually need.” – Dr Jyotsna Mohan Singh

João Tavares, Co-Founder and CEO of Nexus Governance, presented an analysis of 474 Voluntary Local Reviews from 359 cities in 72 countries. He pointed out that the local reviews are becoming more candid: challenges rose from 11% to 29% of reported items between 2017 and 2025. Cities name financing, institutional capacity and coordination across government tiers as their main barriers. In Europe, 45% of commitments are concrete, compared with 50% worldwide.  

“Cities have already written the evidence. What we have done is make it countable: 474 local reviews, from 359 cities in 72 countries.”  

“Local reviews are becoming more honest. Challenges have gone from 11% to 29% of what cities report, led by the most vulnerable territories.” – Joao Tavares


Gabriele Köhler, Board Member of Women Engage for a Common Future (WECF), warned of a global retrogression on women’s rights, with austerity and militarisation displacing social spending. She highlighted the intersecting inequalities and structural barriers, such as unequal access to resources and time poverty, that limit women’s representation and leadership. She also called for building CEDAW and Universal Periodic Review recommendations into SDG 5 accountability in a post-2030 framework. 

“We need to look at the really disaggregated level to see what is happening to women and girls from disadvantaged communities, which can be anything from where they are located to their citizenship, sexual orientation, gender identity, or ethnicity.” 

“I think that beyond 2030, what we really need to think about is binding accountability.” – Gabriele Köhler 


The meeting was also joined by CEMR spokesperson on SDGs, Carola Gunnarsson, the Councillor of Sala Municipality and the Swedish Association of Local Authorities and Regions (SALAR).  

“Trust is perhaps the most important resource we have for managing transformation.”  

“If we can strengthen those partnerships and keep people at the centre of decision making, then local and regional governments will not only implement future global goals, but they will also help shape it being them.” – Carola Gunnarsson  


Four key asks from local and regional governments 

Closing the webinar, Boris Tonhauser, Director of PLATFORMA, stressed that the question is no longer whether territories matter for sustainable development, but whether the next framework will empower them to help shape decisions, not just implement them. He recalled the key asks that will structure the CEMR-PLATFORMA position: 

  • Put multilevel governance into practice, giving local and regional governments a defined role in shaping, implementing and reviewing the future framework 
  • Reflect the interconnections of today’s challenges, addressing climate, inequality, demographic change, digital transformation and peace and security in an integrated way 
  • Match ambitions with means of implementation, ensuring access to finance, capacities, data and knowledge 
  • Strengthen international and decentralised cooperation, recognising the contribution of local governments to global sustainable development 

“The question is no longer whether territories matter for sustainable development. The real challenge is whether the post-2030 framework will empower local and regional governments to help shape decisions, not just implement them.”  

“If sustainable development happens in territories, then territories must have a seat at the decision-making table. This means moving from a model of consultation to a model of genuine co-creation and shared governance.” – Boris Tonhauser 

For more information, contact:

Decentralised Cooperation report #2

Decentralised Cooperation Mindcraft

Decentralised Development Cooperation Report #2: A European overview

372 words
2–3 minutes

Following the first Decentralised Development Cooperation Report (DDC Report #1), this second Report (DDC Report #2) draws on the same Europe-wide survey to continue offering a pan-European overview of how local and regional governments (LRGs), their associations, and civil society actors engage in international cooperation. 

While DDC Report #1 presented a general overview of reported decentralised development cooperation (DDC), this second report digs deeper into the opportunities and challenges shaping decentralised cooperation and looks at the results that DDC partnerships aim to achieve. It also showcases a selection of DDC projects, offering illustrative examples of what effective partnerships and activities look like in practice. 

Where does Europe stand when it comes to DDC? 

The second DDC Report highlights: 

  1. Funding drives engagement, but limited capacities hold it back. Available funding and linguistic, cultural or historical ties (both 56.75%) are the top drivers of involvement in DDC. Yet, limited capacities (78.37%) and limited or inconsistent funding opportunities (54. 05%) appear as the biggest challenge for scaling up. 
  1. Similar goals in focus. Respondents most frequently selected the following three results that their DDC partnerships aim to achieve in both partner and home territories:  empowering local leaders and stakeholders, improving local public services, and strengthening local governance. Which one takes priority, though, differs depending on the territory in focus. 
  1. A lasting commitment. The majority of respondents (78.38%) plan to continue cooperating with their DDC partners, pointing out that decentralised cooperation is seen as a long-term investment rather than a one-off exercise. 

This report is part of a wider series of Mindcraft publications on decentralised development cooperation, including Country Profiles on DDC frameworks. You can find the rest of Mindcraft’s publications here. 

Read the full Mindcraft DDC Report #2, available in English, French, Spanish, and German.  

Discover Mindcraft DDC Report #1 here. 

CEMR encourages European and national authorities to strengthen the role of LRGs in development policy, not only as implementers, but also as strategic partners helping shape a more resilient, inclusive, and effective development agenda. 
This report is produced within the Bridging and Mapping Knowledge Gaps in Decentralised Cooperation (Mindcraft), funded by the German Federal Ministry for Economic Cooperation and Development (BMZ) and supported by the Deutsche Gesellschaft für Internationale Zusammenarbeit (GIZ).  

For more information, contact: 

State of the Union: Local Alliance letter

Climate Change News

Local Alliance calls for a stronger role for towns, cities and regions in EU reforms ahead of SOTEU

342 words
1–2 minutes

A day ahead of President Ursula von der Leyen’s State of the European Union (SOTEU), CEMR has joined Local Alliance, which comprises seven other leading European networks of local and regional governments including ACR+, Climate Alliance, Energy Cities, Eurocities, FEDARENE, ICLEI Europe and POLIS, in a joint letter reaffirming support for a more competitive, resilient and cohesive Union, while raising a clear warning about the direction EU reforms are taking.

The letter recalls the summer’s wildfires and heatwaves, during which towns, cities and regions coordinated evacuations, sheltered residents and led recovery efforts. It is a reminder, Local Alliance writes, that cities and regions are not mere implementers of EU policy: they carry out close to 70% of EU legislation and account for around 68% of climate-significant public investment across the EU and OECD countries.

The signatories warn that the Commission’s envisaged restructuring of its services, the next Multiannual Financial Framework and ongoing simplification efforts risk removing both the institutional dialogue and the financial channels through which local and regional governments engage with the Union. Streamlining EU governance is welcome, the Local Alliance stressed, but not if it comes at the cost of centralisation, weaker locally led transitions, or a thinner territorial dimension in EU policy and funding.

The letter also points to the local dimension of Europe’s other priorities: security, economy and enlargement, noting that towns, cities and regions integrate people fleeing war, sustain partnerships with Ukrainian towns that will matter even more during reconstruction, and are where enlargement will ultimately be felt by citizens in candidate countries.

The ask is simple. The Local Alliance calls on President von der Leyen to use her State of the Union address to reaffirm the Commission’s commitment to local and regional governments as trusted, indispensable partners with a strong Commission service that engages with them directly, and an EU budget that gives them the investment and capacity to deliver for every community.

For more information, contact:

EU Delegations study

Mindcraft study on EU Delegations 2026

EU Delegations engagement with local and regional governments: what will it take to make that cooperation more systematic?

441 words
2–3 minutes

“The Work of EU Delegations with Local and Regional Governments” is a new Mindcraft publication, following on from the report published by PLATFORMA in 2021. Since 2021, the EU’s external action framework has undergone significant change. Under the Neighbourhood, Development and International Cooperation Instrument (NDICI) Global Europe and the Global Gateway strategy, EU international cooperation has moved towards a more geographic, investment-driven approach, with growing emphasis on the localisation of development cooperation.

This new study examines to what extent and how EU Delegations (EUDs) engage with Local and Regional Governments (LRGs) and their associations (LRGAs) in the partner countries. It is based on a 2025 survey of 40 EUDs worldwide and, interviews with five of them in Chad, Guatemala, Madagascar, Nepal and Zambia, as well as additional exchanges with EU Member States development cooperation agencies.

 Key findings:

  1. Enabling environment is key for LRG engagement. 62.5% of surveyed EUDs assessed the decentralisation in the partner country as favourable, and 57.5% support decentralisation efforts. Examples across partner countries show that support to local governance and public finance management helps LRGs engage in territorial development and EU-funded initiatives, though access to finance and the preparation of bankable projects remain persistent challenges.
  2. LRG engagement in EU international cooperation remains uneven and rather limited. 57.5% of surveyed EUDs stated they engage with LRGs and LRGAs under the NDICI-Global Europe, while 20% stated they engage with them under the Global Gateway strategy. EUDs point to the lack of a right framework for structured cooperation as an obstacle. 69.2% consider that a specific budget line for LRGs would help.
  3. LRG engagement can be valuable in fragile contexts. Among EUDs working in fragile settings, 76.4% consider that engaging with LRG would facilitate their work.
  4. Decentralised cooperation remains generally underused.  Illustrative examples of partnerships between European and partner-country LRGs, along with cooperation through LRGAs and their international cooperation structures, show real potential to strengthen local governance and support the localisation of EU initiatives but require greater visibility and emphasis.
  5. There is an ongoing need to strengthen EUDs capacities to work with LRGs. Only 30% of surveyed EUDs reported having received specialised training or support for engaging with LRGs, which were assessed useful for understanding territorial approaches to local development.

These findings come at a timely moment, as negotiations on the 2028–2034 Multiannual Financial Framework, including its proposed Global Europe Instrument, are underway. CEMR-PLATFORMA calls for a clear engagement framework, dedicated funding mechanisms for LRGs, and stronger support for decentralised cooperation as a route to shared development goals.

Read the full publication, available in:

For more information, contact:

Detention of Mayor Sinem Dedetaş

Uskudar Turkyie

CEMR expresses solidarity with the detained Mayor of Üsküdar in Türkiye  

397 words
2–3 minutes

The Council of European Municipalities and Regions (CEMR), together with President Christoph Schnaudigel, voices full solidarity with Mayor Sinem Dedetaş, member of the CEMR Policy Committee, following her detention, and calls on Turkish authorities and European institutions to defend local self-government and the rule of law.  

CEMR has issued a statement expressing its deep concern over the detention today of Sinem Dedetaş, Mayor of Üsküdar and member of the CEMR Policy Committee, along with several members of her team. 

CEMR stresses that this is not an isolated case, but the latest in a sustained series of actions targeting democratically elected local representatives in Türkiye. Since the 2024 local elections, more than 80 municipalities in the country have seen their elected mayors replaced through trustee appointments, dismissals or arrests, while over 30 mayors have been detained, many remaining in prolonged pre-trial detention. 

“As President of CEMR, I wish to express full solidarity with Mayor Sinem Dedetaş and with all local elected representatives affected by these developments“, writes Christoph Schnaudigel, CEMR President and President of the County of Karlsruhe (Germany). 

It should be noted that when mayors and local leaders are deprived of their liberty and unable to exercise the mandates entrusted to them by citizens, the consequences extend far beyond those directly concerned: each case leaves a community without the representatives it elected. Taken together, these developments point to a steady erosion of local democracy and a lack of respect for the will of voters in Türkiye. 

CEMR recalls the importance of the principles enshrined in the European Charter of Local Self-Government, including respect for democratic mandates and the autonomy of local governments; principles CEMR considers essential to maintaining citizens’ trust in democratic institutions at all levels. 

CEMR calls on the Turkish authorities to ensure full respect for fundamental democratic standards and the rule of law, and to guarantee that elected representatives can carry out their responsibilities freely and without undue interference. It also calls on European institutions and the international community to stand in solidarity with democratically elected local representatives in Türkiye, and to continue advocating for the protection of local self-government, democratic institutions and the rule of law. 

CEMR will continue to monitor developments closely and stand alongside its members and partners in Türkiye in their commitment to democratic local governance. 

For more information, contact:

Cities and regions in the EU Pact on Migration and Asylum

EU Pact on Migration

Why Europe’s migration reform will be won or lost in towns, cities and regions

532 words
2–3 minutes

The EU Pact on Migration and Asylum entered its application phase this year. The Council of European Municipalities and Regions (CEMR) puts a question at the centre of that transition: are the local and regional governments who will actually deliver the Pact being treated as partners in shaping it?

Drawing on a questionnaire circulated among CEMR member associations, direct exchanges with local and regional leaders, and complementary desk research, the report maps how prepared towns, cities and regions are for the Pact’s application, how involved they have been in designing it, and what they say they need to make it work.

Already central, not always recognised

The findings confirm what many mayors and regional leaders already know from experience: local and regional governments are not new to migration governance; they are already at its centre. Long before the Pact, towns, cities and regions were carrying the bulk of integration, housing, education, health and social support for migrants and asylum seekers. Regional authorities reported responsibilities in this field in 87.5% of cases, and municipal authorities in 62.5%.

A governance gap

Half of respondents said local and regional governments were not consulted at all during the Pact’s negotiation and drafting. Where consultation did happen, it was often informal, ad hoc, or limited to written contributions requested by national authorities. No country reported involving local and regional governments (LRGs) as genuine co-designers of national implementation plans, CEMR calls this a “missing link” in multi-level governance: the level expected to deliver the Pact on the ground is rarely in the room when the rules are set.

A capacity gap

Responsibility without resources is a recurring theme. Only Austria considered its LRGs “mostly prepared” for the Pact; several other countries reported no additional resources at all since 2024. Where support existed, it was sporadic: extra IT tools here, an operational manual there, rarely the stable, dedicated funding implementation requires.

A coordination gap

Information about the Pact often reached local authorities through fragmented channels — circulars, ministry emails, informal networks, even the press; and clarity about who is responsible for what varied sharply from one country to the next. This uncertainty was not a side effect; it actively hampered planning, budgeting, and staffing decisions on the ground.

Was the deadline ever realistic?

For most respondents, the June 2026 application deadline of the Pact looked difficult or uncertain, well before it arrived, held back by staff shortages, unclear national guidance, and delayed preparations. Yet the report also points to a genuine reserve of capability: local authorities’ rapid, resourceful response to the displacement of people fleeing Ukraine shows what towns, cities and regions can do under pressure — provided that effort does not have to rely on improvisation every time.

What comes next

The analysis closes with three recommendations:

  1. Formally recognise LRGs within the Pact’s governance architecture;
  2. Strengthen synergies between AMIF, ESF+ and other EU funds around a more place-based approach;
  3. Ensure the Pact’s monitoring mechanisms track local and regional implementation, not only national transposition.

CEMR will continue to bring this evidence into the EU debate as the Pact moves further into its implementation phase.

For more information, contact:

The future of the SDGs is local

High Level Policy Forum news 2026

The future of the 2030 Agenda should be local, or it won’t be

1,701 words
7–11 minutes

More than 15 European mayors and local leaders dominated the stage this week in New York. They run from one session to another at the UN High-Level Political Forum (HLPF) on Sustainable Development to defend the role of towns, cities and regions in delivering the 2030 Agenda and helping define what comes next. Through various events, mostly co-organised by the Global Task Force of Local and Regional Governments led by UCLG, European local leaders took the floor more than 50 times. 

With only four years to go until 2030, the clock is ticking to implement as much as possible the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs), but also to shape their future. During the UN-proofed Local and Regional Governments Forum, but also the Global Task Force Local and Regional Governments Day, and the CEMR-PLATFORMA meeting with the EU Delegation in New York, mayors and local leaders gave examples and ideas on how to implement the 2030 Agenda from the ground. They all asked the United Nations (UN) to deepen local and regional governments’ engagement, stressing that SDG 11 (Sustainable Cities and Communities), among many others, cannot be delivered without empowering towns, cities and regions.

Even if the Local and Regional Governments Forum is officially recognised as being part of HLPF, towns, cities and regions are absent from the final conclusions of the ECOSOC (UN’s Economic and Social Council, a platform to advance the economic, social and environmental dimension of sustainable development), responsible for the organisation of HLPF. However, the numerous UN officials who attended the various sessions all recognised the key role of local and regional governments in achieving the SDGs and defining their future shape.

High Level Policy Forum - CEMR and PLATFORMA 2026
High-Level Policy Forum – CEMR and PLATFORMA, New York 2026

The voice of European local leaders at the United Nations

The future is local

Wim Dries, Mayor of Genk (Belgium), Association of Flemish Cities and Municipalities (VVSG): “Local and regional governments are often invited only after decisions have already been made. We need a stronger role in decision-making, adequate financing, and better coordination. We connect SDGs to budgets. The SDGs will be local or they won’t be.”

Antoine Le Solleuz, Deputy Mayor of Nancy (France), AFCCRE and Cités Unies France: “For me, SDG17 (Partnerships for the goals) is not the last SDG, it’s in fact the first one. We need real commitments to meet the SDGs by 2030. We call on the UN to recognise networks of cities and regions as partners, especially in areas such as the climate crises, to strengthen multilateralism.”

Xavier García Albiol, Mayor of Badalona (Spain), Spanish Federation of Municipalities and Provinces (FEMP): “As we look beyond the 2030 Agenda, we must build on what works. SDG localisation delivers results, but we need stronger financing, partnerships, and empowered governments at the heart of implementation.”

“Housing must be at the centre of the future post 2030 Agenda. The challenge beyond 2030 will depend on how well we deliver on the commitments we have already made. Rather than setting new goals, we need to focus on the areas where implementation is still falling short and where the response has not been sufficient. The years after 2030 will be decisive in turning these commitments into tangible benefits that citizens can clearly see and experience.”

Local leaders in New York 2026
Local leaders in New York for the High-Level Policy Forum 2026

María del Mar Vázquez, Mayor of Almería (Spain), Andalusian Fund of Municipalities for International Solidarity (FAMSI): “We have developed a local plan to localise the 2030 Agenda, with over 70% achieved so far. To face our challenges, we need: real multilevel governance, financing, and stronger cooperation between different spheres of governance.”

Barbara Meyer, Mayor of the City of Saarbrücken, German Association of Cities (DST): “Cities are responsible for more than a third of the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs). That is why cities should be the focus of the era beyond 2030.”

Eckart Würzner, Mayor of Heidelberg (Germany), Association of German Cities (DST): “We need a step forward: empowering local governments through local development banks and stronger funding mechanisms. We see more and more discussions and support from finance ministers and development banks towards local and regional governments. It is time to ensure this happens. SDG 11 should be at the centre of the future SDGs. If you focus on city diplomacy, you can be the game changer.”

Gunn Marit Helgesen, President of the Congress of Local and Regional Authorities and President of the Norwegian Association of Local & Regional Authorities (KS): “The SDGs won’t be achieved in conference rooms. They will happen within local communities.”

Quality public services and adequate funding

Localising SDGs - New York 2026
Local 2030 meeting – High-Level Policy Forum in New York 2026

Jordi Castellana, Vice President of the Barcelona Metropolitan Area, Spain: “Quality public services are how people experience the SDGs. Metropolitan governments need stronger multilevel cooperation and direct access to finance to deliver local change.”

Clare Hart, Vice-President of Montpellier metropole (France), Cités Unies France: “Infrastructure alone is never enough. Sustainable public services require strong local governance, skilled public institutions and trust —and maybe even caring— between our partners. This is why investing in territorial cooperation is also investing in the achievement of the Sustainable Development Goals.”

Marek Hudak, Member of the City of Bardejov and Member of Presov Regional Council (Slovakia), Member of CEMR Young Elected Officials Committee (YEOC), Association of Towns and Communities of Slovakia (ZMOS): “Looking beyond 2030, our cities and regions face major challenges. From a Slovak perspective, strengthening decentralisation – with adequate funding, competences and responsibilities – it is essential, especially in the context of the future Cohesion Policy and the next EU budget. At the same time, innovation will be key to keeping our regions competitive and ensuring that young people can build their futures in the places they call home.”

Stronger partnerships

High-Level Policy Forum debate in New York 2026
High-Level Policy Forum debate in New York 2026

Ander Caballero, Secretary General for External Action, Basque Government, Spain: “Major global challenges also require responses at the regional and local levels. Systemic challenges cannot be solved in silos. Strong partnerships across all levels of government, academia and communities are essential, because how we work together is just as important as what we achieve.”

Rosanna Laconi, Regional Minister of the Autonomous Region of Sardinia (Italy): “Strong partnerships, robust evaluation and inclusive governance are key to scaling local action and delivering lasting impact.”

Clare Hart, Vice-President of Montpellier Métropole (France), Cités Unies France: “It is equally important that local governments have a voice and a seat at the table here at the United Nations, a highly symbolic place where local voices are finally being heard and where we can contribute directly to shaping our future. Let’s be optimistic about the future, with cities fully engaged as partners in delivering sustainable development for all.”

“We have the imminent end of the 2030 Agenda for the SDGs, and we are not strictly on track. Local governments are responsible for delivering 70–80% of the SDGs, which makes supporting them essential to advancing the SDGs agenda. Sharing ideas is key to accelerating progress and strengthening collaboration.”

Eider Inuntziaga, Councillor for Citizen Attention and Participation, the 2030 Agenda and International Relations and Euskera, Bilbao City Council (Spain): “Localisation is a method. Our strategy embeds the SDGs in our daily work, with a methodology focused on a transformative agenda, action plans to involve communities and developing capacities. The post 2030 Agenda has to go one step ahead.”

Bärbel Kofler, Parliamentary State Secretary to the Federal Minister for Economic Cooperation and Development, Germany: “Localising the SDGs means equipping municipalities with the resources they need to deliver. Through peer learning & partnerships like the Local 2030 Coalition, cities are driving innovation.”

The UN still needs to walk the talk

CEMR and PLATFORMA in New York for the High-Level Policy Forum 2026
CEMR and PLATFORMA in New York for the High-Level Policy Forum 2026

Anacláudia Rossbach, Under-Secretary-General and Executive Director of the United Nations Human Settlements Programme (UNHABITAT): “Localising the SDGs is the only way to close the implementation gap. Through the Local2030 Coalition, we are working together to support cities and local governments with the tools, partnerships, and platforms they need.”

Koldo Casla, UN Special Rapporteur on the Right to Adequate Housing: “The right to housing is realised locally. From social and public housing to rent control and land policies, local and regional governments play a central role in protecting human rights & ensuring no one is left behind.”

Sarah Lister, Global Director for Governance, Rule of Law and Peacebuilding, UNDP: “The last five years of the 2030 Agenda demand stronger collaboration across all levels of government. Empowering local governments while reinforcing national-local partnerships will be essential to accelerate progress on the SDGs.”

Dario Liguti, Director, Energy, Housing & Land Management Division, United Nations Economic Commission for Europe (UNECE): “Local and regional governments need to be involved from the outsets in implementing solutions. The Global Taskforce of Local and Regional Governments makes this possible by bringing the organised voices of LRGs to the steering committee of Local 2030″

Amina Mohammed, UN Deputy Secretary-General: “SDGs must be built with local actors. The UN Secretary General’s Report sets out how the UN needs to work. The role of local and regional governments needs to be embedded in how we plan, finance and deliver. Let this Forum be a catalyst for shared solutions”

Lok Bahadur Thapa, President of the UN Economic and Social Council (UNECOSOC): “We need to strengthen local actions through Voluntary Local Reviews, to reinforce the value of local acceleration of the 2030 Agenda. The next phase needs to be defined by delivery, measurable actions, strong partnerships and local action.”

“The next phase of SDG implementation must be defined by delivery – moving from commitments to measurable action, strengthening partnerships across all levels of government, and ensuring solutions reach the communities where they are needed most. The success of the 2030 Agenda will ultimately be measured not by the ambitions we express, but by the realities people experience in their daily lives. That is why local leadership is indispensable.”

To strengthen the role of local and regional governments in the 2030 Agenda and the post‑2030 framework, CEMR and PLATFORMA, together with UCLG, will continue working closely with local leaders and with actors across the multilateral system. They will also keep producing knowledge, including reports like the one presented this year at the HLPF (European Territories Localise the SDGs), which shows how essential towns, cities and regions are to delivering the SDGs.

Check the HLPF album here

For more information, contact:

Localising the Sustainable Development Goals in Europe

Reference Framework for Sustainable Cities - image 1

European territories localise the SDGs: cities at the core of implementation

613 words
3–4 minutes

With less than four years remaining to achieve the 2030 Agenda, a new CEMR–PLATFORMA report highlights a clear message from local and regional governments across Europe: sustainable development will only succeed if cities, towns and regions are placed at the centre of decision-making, financing and implementation.

Published by the Council of European Municipalities and Regions (CEMR) and PLATFORMA at the occasion of the High-Level Political Forum on Sustainable Development (HLPF), the 2026 edition of the report European territories localise the SDGs: Cities at the core of the implementation examines how local and regional governments are contributing to the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) and what is needed to accelerate progress during the final stretch to 2030.

The study is based on a survey of 23 respondents from 17 countries, including associations of local and regional governments from 15 EU Member States and two non-EU countries.

Local action is essential for global goals

The report comes at a pivotal moment. As both the UN New Urban Agenda and the Urban Agenda for the EU reach their tenth anniversary, local and regional governments are reaffirming their indispensable role in translating global ambitions into concrete results on the ground.

From mobility and housing to climate resilience and social inclusion, towns, cities and regions are responsible for many of the policies that directly affect residents’ daily lives. According to the report, SDG implementation is not primarily a technical matter but a political one, requiring trust, resources and authority to be devolved to the territorial level.

The publication places particular emphasis on SDG 11 – Sustainable Cities and Communities, one of the goals under review at the 2026 HLPF. It argues that sustainable urban development cannot be achieved without strong local democracy, effective multi-level governance and meaningful involvement of subnational authorities in national and international decision-making processes.

Six recommendations to accelerate SDG implementation

Drawing on the experience of local and regional governments, the report puts forward six recommendations addressed to the United Nations, the European Union and national governments.

Among its key messages, the study calls for:

  • Reinforcing multi-level governance as a political priority for the 2026–2030 period.
  • Placing the subnational level at the centre of SDG implementation, including stronger participation of local and regional governments in global review processes and improved access to development finance.
  • Reaffirming the importance of the UN New Urban Agenda as the main global framework for sustainable urbanisation.
  • Ensuring that cities and towns remain central to Europe’s sustainable development agenda through stronger alignment between EU and UN urban policy frameworks.
  • Recognising the role of territories in the upcoming EU Multiannual Financial Framework 2028–2034, with more accessible and place-based funding for municipalities and regions.
  • Accelerating the localisation of the SDGs by fully involving local and regional governments in the design and implementation of sustainable development policies.

A contribution to the global SDG debate

Beyond policy recommendations, the report showcases good practices from across Europe and explores how local and regional governments are advancing the goals under review in 2026 (SDG 6 – Clean Water and Sanitation, SDG 7 – Affordable and Clean Energy), SDG 9 – Industry, Innovation, and Infrastructure, and SDG 17 – Partnerships for the Goals). It also includes a dedicated focus on housing and the outcomes of discussions linked to the World Urban Forum, reflecting growing concerns about affordability, inclusion and sustainable urban growth.

As the international community approaches the final years of the 2030 Agenda, the report sends a strong and consistent message: the SDGs will be achieved — or missed — at the local level. Empowering towns, cities and regions with the necessary political mandate, resources and partnerships is therefore not optional, but essential.

Discover this report also online: European Territories Localise the SDGs

For more information, contact: